[1.A Health District Annual Update]
[00:00:48]
DEPARTMENT. WE HAVE A LOCAL OFFICES IN ROUND ROCK, CEDAR PARK AND TAYLOR, BUT WE ALSO HAVE AN OFFICE. OUR OFFICE SERVES FIVE DAYS A WEEK AT THE CARVER CENTER, AND THEN OUR NAVIGATION PROGRAM IS ONE DAY A WEEK OUT THERE, BUT WE ARE LOOKING IN THE NEXT YEAR TO BE OUT THERE MORE PERMANENTLY. WE ALSO GO OUT ONE DAY A WEEK TO LIBERTY HILL FOR OUR WICK DEPARTMENT, AND THEN WE ALSO ARE JUST NOW GETTING APPROVAL AND STARTED TO GET A MOBILE UNIT, WHICH WILL BE VERY USEFUL TO BE OUT IN NEEDED AREAS, ESPECIALLY IN GEORGETOWN, THAT DOESN'T HAVE A PERMANENT CLINICAL PROGRAM OUT HERE. SO WE'LL BE ABLE TO DO SCREENINGS, IMMUNIZATIONS, AND MORE OUTREACH AND EDUCATION, A LITTLE BIT MORE MOBILE, BE ABLE TO GET OUT TO AREAS THAT HAVE TRANSPORTATION NEEDS IN A MORE EASILY ACCESSIBLE WAY. THAT RFP FOR THAT MOBILE UNIT SHOULD GO OUT IN THE NEXT MONTH. SO WE'LL HOPEFULLY HAVE THAT IN THE NEXT SIX MONTHS. WE'RE ALSO AN ACCREDITED AGENCY, SO WE MEET NATIONAL STANDARDS FOR HEALTH DEPARTMENTS ACROSS THE COUNTRY. FOR OUR FUNDING. WE USE A DIVERSE FUNDING MODEL TO SUPPORT PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES ACROSS THE COUNTY. OUR FUNDING COMES FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY, SEVEN MEMBER CITIES, STATE GRANTS, ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH AND PROGRAM FEES, INSURANCE CLAIMS, INVESTMENT INCOME AND RESERVE FUNDS WHEN APPROPRIATE. GEORGETOWN'S CONTRIBUTION COMES FROM OOPS, SORRY, JUST LOST MY NOTES. HOLD ON. SORRY IS BASED ON POPULATION AT A CURRENT RATE OF $2.35 PER RESIDENT, AND WE MAXIMIZE EVERY DOLLAR WE RECEIVE AND ARE PURSUING GRANTS ACTIVELY TO ENSURE THAT WE HAVE ALTERNATIVE FUNDING SOURCES AND ARE SUPPORTING INNOVATION AND APPLYING EVERY NEEDED SERVICE AND AND GETTING NEEDED SERVICES OUT TO GEORGETOWN RESIDENTS IN ALL OF RESIDENTS IN IN THE COUNTY THIS YEAR, WE ALSO OR THIS PAST YEAR, WE ALSO WENT THROUGH A STRATEGIC PLANNING PROCESS. SO THIS PAST FALL, WE BROUGHT TOGETHER OUR BOARD MEMBERS AND SEVERAL STAFF MEMBERS TO UPDATE OUR MISSION AND VISION. AND THESE STATEMENTS HADN'T BEEN UPDATED SINCE 2017. SO WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT WE THESE REFLECTED OUR CURRENT DIRECTION AND EMPHASIZE THE COLLABORATION AS NEARLY EVERYTHING THAT WE DO IN PUBLIC HEALTH REALLY EMPHASIZES STRONG PARTNERSHIPS. AND STRONG COMMUNICATION, ESPECIALLY DURING EMERGENCIES, AND THAT WE ARE FOCUSING ON INNOVATION AS PUBLIC HEALTH ISN'T WHAT WE NEEDED TEN YEARS AGO. AND PUBLIC HEALTH NEEDS TO LOOK FORWARD BECAUSE WHAT WE NEED IN TEN YEARS FROM NOW, WHAT WE WANT TEN YEARS FROM NOW IS WHAT WE'RE GOING TO HAVE. WE ALSO LOOKED AT OUR VALUE STATEMENTS TO MAKE SURE THAT THE VALUES THAT WE HAVE WITHIN OUR STAFF ARE OUR TRUE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE THINGS THAT WE ARE DOING. SO THESE ARE THE THE VALUES THAT OUR STAFF PRESENTED TO OUR BOARD AND OUR BOARD APPROVED, AND THAT YOU CAN EXPECT FROM OUR STAFF ANY TIME THAT YOU INTERACT WITH US. OUR STRATEGIC PLAN ACTUALLY COMES OUT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT IN THE NEXT TWO WEEKS, I BELIEVE. SO YOU SHOULD SEE THAT HERE SHORTLY. BUT THESE ARE OUR THREE PRIORITY AREAS THAT YOU WILL SEE. THE FIRST ONE IS WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT AND CAPACITY. SO WE WANT TO MAKE SURE OUR STAFF ARE WELL TRAINED AS WE CAN'T OFFER OUR SERVICES UNLESS WE HAVE A TRAINED STAFF. WE ALSO WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE ARE BECOMING GOOD HEALTH COMMUNICATORS AND GOOD PARTNERS. SO MAKING SURE THAT OUR
[00:05:05]
SERVICES THAT WE ARE PROVIDING ARE ARE BEING WELL COMMUNICATED AND WE'RE GIVING GOOD DATA TO OUR PARTNERS AND THEN MAINTAINING PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES AND EXCELLENT AND STRIVE FOR INNOVATION, PURSUING THOSE MODERN SERVICES, IMPROVING OUR REPORTING AND UPDATING OUR FINANCIAL AND GRANT MANAGEMENT PROCESSES. SO ON TO THE SERVICES THAT WE ARE CURRENTLY PROVIDING. PREVENTING DISEASES. THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WE ARE COMMONLY KNOWN FOR IMMUNIZATIONS, WOMEN'S HEALTH VISITS, TB CASE MANAGEMENT. WHEN YOU LOOK AT THIS DATA, THIS IS COUNTY WIDE DATA FOR THE FOR GEORGETOWN RESIDENTS, WE HAD ABOUT 12% OF THE IMMUNIZATIONS THAT WE GAVE WERE FOR GEORGETOWN RESIDENTS. AND WE HAD ABOUT 16% OF OUR WOMEN'S HEALTH VISITS FROM GEORGETOWN RESIDENTS. FOR TB. WE DON'T HAVE GEORGETOWN SPECIFIC CASE DATA, BUT WE DID HAVE ABOUT 43 INDIVIDUALS REFERRED TO US FOR TB TESTING. OUR WICK SERVICES.THIS IS OUR WOMEN, INFANT AND CHILDREN NUTRITION PROGRAM. THIS IS A NATIONAL PROGRAM THAT WE RECEIVE FUNDING FOR. THIS IS MOMS, INFANTS AND YOUNG CHILDREN THAT WE PROVIDE NOT ONLY NUTRITIONAL SUPPORT BUT ALSO EDUCATION ON NUTRITION. AS YOU CAN SEE, THESE NUMBERS HAVE BEEN INCREASING A LOT OVER THE LAST YEAR OR TWO. AND OUR SITE AT THE CARVER CENTER HAS ACTUALLY SEEN A 21% INCREASE AND HAS SEEN THE HIGHEST INCREASE OVER THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS OVER ALL OF OUR SITES. ONE OF THE THINGS THAT TO MAKE NOTE OF IS IN WICK STARTING THIS MONTH STARTED UICC. AND UICC IS AN ELECTRONIC WICK SERVICE. SO NO LONGER DO EVERY WICK CLIENT HAVE TO COME IN AND UPDATE THEIR WICK CARD. THEY CAN DO IT ELECTRONICALLY, WHICH DOES REDUCE SOME OF THE TRANSPORTATION BARRIERS. SO WE WILL LIKELY SEE WICK SERVICES INCREASE AS A LOT OF PATIENT OR A LOT OF CLIENTS DON'T COME BACK TO UPDATE THEIR WICK CARD BECAUSE OF THAT BARRIER, WHICH IS SOMETHING THAT WE WERE VERY EXCITED TO HAVE. THEY DON'T HAVE TO COME IN, BUT ONCE EVERY QUARTER NOW, INSTEAD OF ONCE EVERY MONTH. WE DO A LOT FOR EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE. THIS INCLUDES OUR MEDICAL RESERVE CORPS, OUR EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS TEAM, AND OUR EPIDEMIOLOGISTS WITH OUR DISEASE REPORTING. AS YOU CAN SEE HERE, OUR DISEASE REPORTS HAVE GONE UP AS WELL. THIS IS BECAUSE NOT JUST BECAUSE OF GROWTH IN THE COUNTY, BUT ALSO BECAUSE OF VACCINE PREVENTABLE DISEASES, HEALTH CARE ACQUIRED AND HEALTH CARE ACQUIRED INFECTIONS AND OUTBREAKS LIKE CYCLOSPORA. WE DO HAVE SOME CYCLOSPORA CASES IN THE COUNTY. WE DON'T HAVE AS MANY AS OTHERS IN THE COUNTRY, BUT WE DO HAVE SOME THAT ARE LINKED TO THE NATIONAL OUTBREAK, AND NONE THAT HAVE BEEN LINKED TO ANY OF THE POINTS, SOURCES THAT HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED. BUT ONGOING INVESTIGATIONS. JUST AS A POINT OF REFERENCE RIGHT NOW FOR OTHER EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES, WE ARE VERY GOOD PARTNERS WITH Y'ALL'S EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS TEAM. WE ACTUALLY JUST PARTNERED WITH THEM IN OUR MEETING RECENTLY TO MAKE SURE EVERYONE IN GEORGETOWN, BUT ALSO IN THE COUNTY FOR HEALTH CARE AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, BOTH FIRE, EMS, ETC. KNOW HOW TO HANDLE AN EBOLA PATIENT SHOULD ANYONE BECOME POSITIVE. SO THAT WAS SOMETHING THAT HAPPENED AND WAS A BIG ACTIVITY FOR US IN JUNE. AND OUR MEDICAL RESERVE CORPS WAS A BIG PARTNER DURING THE FLOODS OF LAST YEAR. OUR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH TEAM IS SOMETHING THAT IS VERY NOTICEABLE IN THE COUNTY. SO IF YOU EAT AT A RESTAURANT, YOU'VE INTERACTED WITH THEM AS THEY INSPECT ALL OF THE RESTAURANTS IN THE COUNTY. LAST YEAR IN GEORGETOWN, THEY PERMITTED 779 BUSINESSES AND INSPECTED 668 OF THEM. AND THOSE INSPECTIONS COULD BE MULTIPLE BUSINESSES OR BUSINESSES HAVING MULTIPLE INSPECTIONS IF THEY HAD COMPLAINTS. AND WE HAVE GREAT PARTNERSHIPS WITH THOSE BUSINESSES, AND I'LL GET TO THE MOBILE INSPECTION CHANGE IN A MOMENT. BUT I WANT TO TALK ABOUT MOSQUITOES FOR A MOMENT. WE ALSO DO MOSQUITO SURVEILLANCE. SO IF, AS YOU HEAR ABOUT WEST NILE POSITIVE MOSQUITO POOLS, THAT'S OUR
[00:10:03]
STAFF COLLECTING THAT. WE HAVE ABOUT 12 TRAPS IN GEORGETOWN. AND RIGHT NOW WE'VE HAD WE HAVE HAD SOME POSITIVES. WE'VE HAD EIGHT POSITIVES IN THE LAST MONTH. THE LATEST HAVE BEEN AT EDWARDS PARK DOWNTOWN AND AT SUN CITY. AND WE'VE HAD TO DO SOME MOSQUITO CONTROL LATELY.SO JUST AS A HEADS UP, IF YOU'RE GOING TO BE OUTSIDE, ESPECIALLY IN THE EARLY MORNING AND, AND AT NIGHT WHERE MOSQUITO REPELLENTS, THAT'S THE BIGGEST WAY TO PREVENT WEST NILE. AND IN JULY OF THIS YEAR. SO THIS MONTH THERE WAS A BIG MOBILE FOOD VENDING LAW CHANGE.
AND THIS WAS. SO INSTEAD OF THE MOBILE FOOD VENDORS GETTING A LOCAL PERMIT, THERE'S NOW A STATEWIDE PERMIT. WE ARE PARTNERS WITH DSHS. SO WE ARE ABLE TO DO LOCAL INSPECTIONS.
AND I WANTED TO JUST HIGHLIGHT THAT AS THAT IS SOMETHING THAT NOT ALL LOCAL HEALTH DEPARTMENTS HAVE. AND WE MADE SURE THAT WE HAVE THAT FOR WILLIAMSON COUNTY, SO THAT IF THERE ARE ANY COMPLAINTS, WE ARE ABLE TO DO THAT INSPECTION HERE LOCALLY. SO WE STILL HAVE THAT. WE STILL MAINTAIN THAT WE ARE STILL DOING THE PERMITTING FOR THEM. THEY JUST ASSIGN WHERE WE'RE GOING. SO INSTEAD OF US KNOW WHERE, WE'RE KNOWING WHERE WE'RE GOING, THEY JUST TELL US WHERE TO GO. AND THEN YOU ALL STILL MAINTAIN KIND OF THE ZONING AND ZONING RULES YOURSELVES. WE ALSO THEN HAVE A NAVIGATION PROGRAM. THEY MAINTAIN THE WILCO CARE. SO THIS IS THE INDIGENT CARE PROGRAM FOR THE COUNTY. AND THEY HAD 358 APPLICANTS LAST YEAR. 42 OF THEM WERE FROM GEORGETOWN. THEY ALSO HAVE A BREAST CANCER, COLON CANCER AND PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING PROGRAM. I DO NOT HAVE NUMBERS SPECIFICALLY FOR GEORGETOWN, BUT IF YOU WANT THEM, I CAN GET THEM FOR YOU. WE ALSO HAVE A NEW BENEFITS ENROLLMENT PROGRAM, SO WE CAN NOW NOT ONLY ENROLL PEOPLE IN WILCO CARE, BUT WE CAN ALSO ENROLL THEM IN MEDICARE, MEDICAID, AND SNAP. SO THAT WAS A NEW PROGRAM THAT WE ADDED ON AND IS THE REASON WHY WE WANT TO BE MORE PERMANENTLY AT THE CARVER CENTER BECAUSE OF. THAT'S HOW WE'VE HAD MORE INTEREST IN THIS NAVIGATION PROGRAM. WE ALSO DO A LOT OF COMMUNITY OUTREACH, AND THAT COMMUNITY OUTREACH IS EDUCATION, SIGNING PEOPLE UP FOR BENEFITS, NAVIGATING THEM THROUGH DIFFERENT PROCESSES, MAKING SURE THAT THEY'RE AWARE OF SERVICES, DOING FIELD IMMUNIZATIONS IN THE, IN THE. MOBLEY. LOTS OF DIFFERENT WAYS THAT WE DO OUTREACH. AND WE DID 16 OF THOSE EVENTS IN GEORGETOWN LAST YEAR. OUR OUTREACH HAS INCREASED OVER THE LAST YEAR. SO YOU'LL SEE THOSE NUMBERS START INCREASING AS WE WANT TO BE MORE AND MORE PUBLIC AND MORE AND MORE MOBILE IS ONE OF OUR GOALS MOVING FORWARD. ON TOP OF ALL OF THOSE PROGRAMS, WE ARE ALSO THE AGENCY THAT COLLABORATES OR RUNS THE WILLIAMSON COUNTY COALITION. SO OVER 100 ORGANIZATIONS GET BROUGHT TOGETHER FOR THIS COALITION. AND SO IF YOU'RE INTERESTED, YOU CAN SCAN THAT QR CODE AND BE GET JUST GET INFORMATION ABOUT THE COALITION OR YOU CAN JOIN THE COALITION. WE HAVE THREE ACTIVE ACTION GROUPS. THESE ACTION GROUPS ACTUALLY JUST MET, SO THEY WON'T MEET AGAIN FOR ANOTHER MONTH OR TWO. BUT THEY ARE THE ONES THAT RUN THE COUNTY HEALTH IMPROVEMENT PLAN. AND SO THESE ORGANIZATIONS GET TOGETHER AND DECIDE THESE ARE OUR TOP PRIORITIES, AND THIS IS HOW WE'RE GOING TO WORK TOGETHER TO GET THESE PRIORITIES TAKEN CARE OF. AND THE PRIORITIES ARE ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE, CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION, AND THEY'RE MORE FOCUSED ON FOOD AND THE LINK TO CHRONIC DISEASE RIGHT NOW, AND MENTAL HEALTH AND WELL-BEING. WE ALSO WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE WORD GETS OUT ABOUT WHAT PUBLIC HEALTH IS. AND WE HAVE A PODCAST TO DO THAT NOW. SO IF YOU HAVEN'T HEARD OUR PODCAST, IT'S CALLED PUBLIC HEALTH IS WE ARE ON SPOTIFY, APPLE, AND NOW WE ARE OFFICIALLY ON YOUTUBE AS WELL. IT IS JUST VOICE ONLY, BUT WE ARE GOING TO BE DOING A SEASON TWO. SO THAT WILL BE VIDEO. WE HAVE ALSO STARTED A SMALL, WELL, A SHORTER VERSION, WHICH IS CALLED PUBLIC HEALTH IS IN THE NEWS. SO IF THERE'S SOMETHING IN THE NEWS LIKE A MOBILE HEALTH MOBILE LAW CHANGE OR CYCLOSPORA, WE'RE DOING A TEN, 15 MINUTE MOBILE OR A PODCAST THAT GIVES INFORMATION WHAT THE FACTS ARE SO PEOPLE CAN GO AND GET FACTUAL INFORMATION QUICKLY INSTEAD OF TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHAT'S ACTUALLY TRUE IN THE NEWS. AND SO THAT'S WHAT WE
[00:15:01]
HAVE GOING ON. I CAN OPEN ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANY QUESTIONS? GOODMAN FIRST OF ALL, THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR WHAT YOU DO TO YOU AND YOUR TEAM TO KEEP US SAFE HERE. BUT I DO HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT ELIGIBILITY FOR THE DIFFERENT PROGRAMS. SO DO YOU HAVE TO BE A CITIZEN TO BE ELIGIBLE OR ANY PERSON IN THE COUNTRY OR LEGAL STATUS, LEGAL RESIDENCY? WHAT ARE THE CRITERIA FOR ELIGIBILITY FOR YOUR PROGRAMS? SO FOR MOST OF THE PROGRAMS THAT WE'RE OFFERING A SERVICE IN THE CLINIC, YOU HAVE TO BE A LEGAL RESIDENT. BUT FOR EXAMPLE, FOR DISEASE INVESTIGATIONS, THAT'S ANYBODY. IF YOU GET DIAGNOSED WITH AN ILLNESS LIKE CYCLOSPORA, WE HAVE TO FOLLOW UP WITH YOU TO PREVENT THAT FROM SPREADING. BUT IF IT'S WICK OR ONE OF OUR CLINICAL SERVICES OR OUR NAVIGATION PROGRAM, THAT YOU HAVE TO BE A LEGAL RESIDENT. SO YOU MENTIONED WICK. SO THAT'S WOMEN, INFANTS AND CHILDREN. YES, SIR.SO IF THE INFANT OR CHILDREN CHILD IS A RESIDENT, A CITIZEN, BUT THE PARENTS ARE NOT. HOW IS THAT HANDLED? BECAUSE IT'S WOMEN, INFANTS AND CHILDREN. SO YOU'RE HELPING ALL OF THOSE.
BUT ONLY PART OF THEM ARE CITIZENS. HOW DOES THAT WORK? YOU KNOW, THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION. I WILL HAVE TO GET BACK WITH YOU ON THAT ELIGIBILITY. I'M NOT UP TO DATE ON WHAT THE SPECIFIC RULES ARE ON THE MOMS AND THEN THE CHILDREN BEING A RESIDENT OR CITIZEN. AND I WILL HAVE TO GET BACK TO YOU ON THAT ONE. THANK YOU. YEAH. THANKS FOR THE PRESENTATION. JUST WANTED TO ASK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT IT. SEEMS WE RECEIVED THIS PRESENTATION EVERY YEAR. AND I KNOW YOU'RE NEW TO THE PRESENTATION, BUT IT SEEMS LIKE THAT THE ABILITY TO HAVE SO MANY PARTNERSHIP SERVICES AT THE CARVER CENTER HAS REALLY BEEN A BENEFIT TO YOU ALL. IS THAT. YES, VERY MUCH SO, YES. AND IT HAS ALLOWED YOU TO EXPAND, IT SEEMS SERVICES. WHAT IS THE REASON WHY YOU THINK THAT THAT'S WORKING SO WELL? AND WHAT ELSE? IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE THAT COULD BE ADDED THERE OR IMPROVED TO, TO HELP THAT? BECAUSE I REALLY I APPRECIATE THE PARTNERSHIP SERVICES AT CARVER, AND I THINK THE LOCATION WORKS REALLY WELL FOR OUR COMMUNITY, BUT WHAT ELSE COULD WE BE DOING TO MAKE THAT EVEN MORE SUCCESSFUL? I CAN DEFINITELY GET MORE INFORMATION FROM MY STAFF THAT ARE OUT THERE MORE THAN I AM, BUT I DO KNOW THAT IT'S A FABULOUS LOCATION, AND THE PARTNERS THAT ARE OUT THERE REALLY WORK TOGETHER REALLY WELL. I KNOW THAT THEY REFER PEOPLE TO EACH OTHER REALLY WELL. WHENEVER WE HAVE HAD EVENTS OUT THERE, OTHER PARTNERS PASS OUT FLIERS FOR US AND WE PASS OUT FLIERS FOR THEM. SO THE PARTNERSHIPS THAT ARE OUT THERE REALLY WORK WELL TOGETHER. AND I KNOW THAT THE FOLKS THAT RUN IT ARE FANTASTIC, FANTASTIC PEOPLE. AND SO ANYTIME WE NEED ANYTHING, THEY'RE JUST WHATEVER YOU NEED, LET'S HELP EACH OTHER. I CAN'T THINK OF ANYTHING OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD THAT WOULD IMPROVE THINGS, BUT I CAN DEFINITELY ASK THE STAFF AND GET BACK TO YOU ON THAT. OKAY, THAT'D BE GREAT. I'M GLAD TO KNOW THAT IT'S WORKING WELL AND, YOU KNOW, WANT TO SEE THAT CONTINUE TO GROW. OUR STAFF ABSOLUTELY LOVE IT OUT THERE. THANK YOU. YEAH. THE MOBILE VENDOR. FOOD VENDOR CHANGE FROM THE STATE. HAS THAT BEEN WELL RECEIVED FROM THE MOBILE FOOD VENDOR FOLKS OR HAS IT BEEN COMPLICATED. DIFFICULT PROCESS. WE IT IS A NEW PROCESS. IT'S NEW. AS NEW PROCESSES HAPPEN, THERE ARE ALWAYS HICCUPS. WE ARE DOING OUR BEST TO HELP THEM NAVIGATE THE APPLICATION PROCESS WITH THE STATE. SO AS THEY COME TO US, WE HELP. WE HELP THEM WITH THAT APPLICATION PROCESS BECAUSE IT'S DIFFERENT THAN OURS. WE'VE HAD ONE ONE HICCUP. IT WAS OUR FIRST FIRST INSPECTION THAT WE DID, AND WE HAD JUST A LOT OF TECHNOLOGY FAILURES. BUT SINCE THAT ONE, THINGS HAVE GONE SMOOTHLY. AND SO THE STATE HAS THE LOCAL AUTHORITY ADMINISTER THE THE PERMITS. SO DO WE THE FEE GOES TO THE STATE OR ARE WE ABLE AS A LOCAL AUTHORITY THAT'S THAT'S ADMINISTERING. WE GET A CUT OF THE FEE TO TO HELP RECOVER OUR COSTS AS WELL. WE HAVE SIGNED A CONTRACT WITH THEM. SO WE HAVE A SET COST FOR EVERY INSPECTION. WE BASICALLY SEND THEM A BILL. OKAY. YEP. OKAY. AND YOU'RE MENTIONING THE WHATEVER THE STOMACH BUG FROM LETTUCE OR WHATEVER IT IS. CYCLOSPORA. YEAH. I DON'T KNOW HOW TO CALL IT WHAT IT WAS CALLED. I JUST KNOW MY WIFE TOLD ME, DON'T EAT ANY LETTUCE TWO WEEKS BEFORE GOING ON VACATION. SO, BUT THE, THE NUMBERS YOU MENTIONED THERE WERE CASES HERE. ARE THOSE SELF-REPORTED REPORTED OR DO THE LOCAL HOSPITALS AND SUCH REPORT TO THE COUNTY WHENEVER THEY HAVE A CASE? YES. SO WE HAVE GREAT PARTNERSHIPS WITH OUR LOCAL PHYSICIANS AND
[00:20:07]
HOSPITALS AND OTHER CLINICS. THEY ARE REQUIRED TO REPORT CERTAIN THINGS. AND CYCLOSPORA IS ONE OF THOSE THINGS. SO THEY REPORT THEM TO US. THE LABS ACTUALLY REPORT THEM AUTOMATICALLY. SO ONCE SOMEONE TESTS POSITIVE, IT COMES TO US AUTOMATICALLY. AND OUR EPIDEMIOLOGY STAFF FOLLOWS UP WITH THE PHYSICIAN AND THE PATIENT TO MAKE SURE THAT THINGS ARE WHETHER OR NOT IT'S A TRAVEL CASE, WHETHER OR NOT THEY'VE EATEN SOMETHING LOCALLY.THERE'S A WHOLE LONG QUESTIONNAIRE THAT THEY GO THROUGH WITH THOSE INDIVIDUALS AND THAT THAT BUG OR BACTERIA OR WHATEVER IT IS. MY UNDERSTANDING, GETTING THE FACTS. I LIKE TO GET MY FACTS OFF OF RANDOM COMMENTS ON SOCIAL MEDIA, BUT MY UNDERSTANDING IS IT'S NOT PASSED HUMAN TO HUMAN. IT'S ONLY IF YOU CONSUME SOMETHING THAT IS INFECTED. IS THAT CORRECT? CORRECT. IT IS NOT PASSED HUMAN TO HUMAN. IT IS ONLY BY WHAT YOU EAT. YOU CAN GET IT FROM SWIMMING. BUT THAT'S NOT HOW THIS OUTBREAK IS OCCURRING RIGHT NOW. TYPICALLY WHAT WE SEE, BECAUSE IT IS IT'S LIKE WHAT WE CALL HERE CYCLOSPORA SEASON. WE ALWAYS SEE AN INCREASE IN CYCLOSPORA THIS TIME OF YEAR. IT'S USUALLY RELATED TO TRAVEL. AND SO TRAVEL TO OTHER COUNTRIES LIKE MEXICO, SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRIES. THAT'S TYPICALLY WHAT WE SEE. WHAT WE'RE SEEING RIGHT NOW IN OUR NUMBERS IS A MIX OF PEOPLE WHO HAVEN'T TRAVELED AND PEOPLE WHO HAVE. SO IT'S THE PEOPLE WHO HAVEN'T TRAVELED ARE WHAT'S RAISING OUR EYEBROWS GOING, WHAT'S GOING ON WITH THIS? AND WE'RE REALLY ASKING THEM, WHAT HAVE YOU EATEN? WHERE HAVE YOU GOTTEN YOUR VEGETABLES? AND WE'RE PASSING ALONG ALL OF THAT INFORMATION TO THE STATE. THEY'RE KIND OF GATHERING ALL OF IT FROM ALL OVER AND PASSING THAT ALONG TO THE CDC. AND THEY'RE COLLECTING ALL OF THAT INFORMATION TO KIND OF FIND THOSE POINT SOURCES TO FIGURE OUT WHERE THAT'S GOING. ALL THAT TAKES A LONG TIME. SO THAT'S WHY THERE'S KIND OF DELAYS IN IN FIGURING OUT WHERE THINGS ARE GOING. WELL, ONE LAST QUESTION. SO OBVIOUSLY HERE IN GEORGETOWN, WE HAVE BLUE HOLE, BUT THERE'S OTHER AREAS IN THE COUNTY THAT HAVE NATURAL BODIES OF WATER THAT PEOPLE RECREATE IN THE HEALTH DISTRICT DOESN'T HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH CHECKING, TESTING THE WATER QUALITY, ESPECIALLY IN THE SUMMER MONTHS WHERE STANDING WATER STARTS TO GROW DIFFERENT NASTY THINGS THAT CAN BE HARMFUL TO HEALTH, BUT THAT YOU ALL HAVE NO OVERSIGHT OR LEGISLATIVE, I GUESS, AUTHORITY TO TEST WATER OR CHECK QUALITY, OR DO ANY KIND OF REPORTING OR ANYTHING ON THAT. CORRECT? WE DO NOT KNOW. OKAY. YEAH. OKAY. THAT'S WHAT I THOUGHT. I JUST WANTED TO CHECK. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ALL RIGHT. WELL, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANYTHING ELSE YOU NEED FROM US THAT WE CAN DO FOR YOU? NO, THANK YOU GUYS FOR HAVING ME. APPRECIATE YOU
[1.B Woodside In-city MUD Expansion Follow-Up Request]
COMING. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. NEXT UP WE'RE GOING TO TAKE ANOTHER LOOK AT THE WOODSIDE IN CITY MUD REQUEST. AND NICK ARE YOU GOING TO LEAD US OFF ON THIS. YES. GOOD AFTERNOON MAYOR AND COUNCIL NICK WOOLERY, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER. WE ARE BACK AGAIN TO TALK THROUGH THE REQUESTED EXPANSION TO THE WOODSIDE MUD FOR THE AREA CALLED THE THOMPSON TRACT. JUST A REMINDER, AS ALWAYS, THE PURPOSE STATEMENT FOR THE COUNCIL'S MUD POLICY. SO THE PURPOSE TODAY IS STAFF SEEKING COUNCIL'S FEEDBACK AND DIRECTION ON WHETHER TO PROCEED WITH NEGOTIATIONS ON A POTENTIAL IN-CITY MUD EXPANSION FOR THE LAND KNOWN AS THE THOMPSON TRACT. AS YOU'LL REMEMBER, WE WERE HERE JUST I THINK MAYBE A MONTH OR SO AGO WITH THE INITIAL PROPOSAL FROM THE DEVELOPMENT TEAM. THEY'VE MADE SOME ADJUSTMENTS AND BROUGHT BACK SOME ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BASED ON COUNCIL'S FEEDBACK AND QUESTIONS LAST TIME. AND SO WE'RE HERE HERE AGAIN TO PROVIDE THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. SO THE FEEDBACK THAT WE'LL REQUEST AT THE END IS DOES COUNCIL HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS OR FEEDBACK FROM THE FOLLOW UP INFORMATION PRESENTED BASED ON WHAT YOU'VE SEEN, DO YOU SUPPORT STAFF MOVING FORWARD WITH NEGOTIATING A MUD EXPANSION? AND IF YOU DO SUPPORT THE MUD EXPANSION, IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE YOU WOULD LIKE TO SEE INCORPORATED INTO THE AGREEMENT, INTO THE AGREEMENT OR THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN? AND THEN JUST A QUICK BACKGROUND, THIS IS 162.5 ACRES. IT'S CURRENTLY IN THE ETJ. JUST A LITTLE REFERENCE ON THE SCREEN FOR SOME SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS THAT YOU'VE EITHER HEARD FROM RECENTLY. THE YEARWOOD PROJECT IS JUST KIND OF TO THE NORTHWEST HERE. THE EXISTING WOODSIDE KIND OF SURROUNDS THIS THOMPSON TRACT, SUN CITY JUST TO THE WEST AND SOUTHWEST 40 RANCHES ACROSS 195.YOU HAVE NOT SEEN THAT PROPOSAL YET, BUT THAT'S COMING TO YOU IN THE NEAR FUTURE. THEN YOU'VE GOT THE INTERSECTION OF 195 AND RONALD REAGAN. THE WHITE TRIANGLE THAT'S JUST TO THE
[00:25:04]
NORTH IS A PROPERTY THAT REMOVED ITSELF FROM THE ETJ. SO JUST, JUST FOR AWARENESS OF, OF A PROPERTY THAT'S RIGHT ADJACENT TO HERE. SO THIS REQUEST IS TO ANNEX INTO THE CITY LIMITS, AND THEN IT WOULD ALSO ANNEX INTO THE EXISTING WOODSIDE MUD. AND THEN THE ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS WOULD MATCH THE CURRENT PRODUCT WITHIN SUN CITY. THIS IS JUST A REMINDER OF THIS IS THE EXISTING WOODSIDE LAND PLAN THAT YOU'VE GOT ON THE SCREEN RIGHT NOW. SO THIS WHAT YOU'RE SEEING DOES NOT INCORPORATE ANYTHING WITH THE THOMPSON TRACT. THIS IS JUST THE EXISTING WOODSIDE. THIS IS THE PROPOSAL THAT WAS PRESENTED AT THE LAST MEETING, WHICH WOULD BRING IN A. A SMALL PIECE OF THE EXISTING WOODSIDE INTO THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN. AND SO EVERYTHING YOU SEE THAT'S COLORED WOULD BE INCORPORATED INTO SUN CITY. SO JUST TO JUST TO REFRESH ON WHAT WAS SUBMITTED LAST TIME AROUND. AND THEN THE INITIAL FEEDBACK THAT EITHER STAFF GAVE TO THE DEVELOPER OR COUNCIL PROVIDED AT THE MEETING, SOME OF THE HIGH LEVEL FEEDBACK POINTS CONNECTIVITY WAS A BIG POINT, ESPECIALLY TO THE UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY TO THE NORTH, THE ENTRANCE FROM THE COLLECTOR ROAD, LOOKING AT NOT DOING A FOUR WAY STOP AT THAT INTERSECTION. NOISE MITIGATION WAS A BIG COMMENT, ESPECIALLY RELATED TO THE CONNECTION TO 195 WATER. THERE'S A REQUEST FROM STAFF TO FOR THE DEVELOPER TO EXTEND THE 18 INCH WATER LINE ALONG 195. AGE RESTRICTED WAS THE BIG DISCUSSION POINT LAST TIME. ONE OF THE BIG DISCUSSION POINTS LAST TIME IN THAT THE REQUEST WOULD NOT COMPLY WITH COUNCIL'S MUD POLICY, AND THE CONCERN THERE OVER THE FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS TO THE CITY COMMERCIAL WAS ANOTHER THING BROUGHT UP THE DESIRE TO BRING COMMERCIAL ALONG 195 AND THEN THE TAX RATE THE. AND JUST A REMINDER, THE REQUESTED TAX RATE IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH COUNCIL'S MUD POLICY. BUT THERE WERE SOME QUESTIONS ON WHY JUST GENERALLY WHY MUD IS NEEDED FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT AND WHY THAT LEVEL OF TAX RATE IS IS NEEDED. SO WITH THAT, WE'VE GOT REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE DEVELOPMENT TEAM AND THEN PULTE ITSELF TO PROVIDE SOME INFORMATION, AND THEN I'LL COME BACK AT THE END TO GET COUNCIL'S FEEDBACK. NICK, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. MAYOR COUNCIL, THANK YOU FOR THE TIME. MY NAME IS RYAN NIKOLAENKO. I'M THE DIRECTOR OF LAND PLANNING AND ENTITLEMENT WITH PULTEGROUP. WITH ME TODAY IS AMY PAYNE WITH THE BLAKE MCGEE COMPANY, THE DEVELOPER OF THE TRACT. BOTH COMPANIES REPRESENTING DECADES OF EXPERIENCE IN DOING BUSINESS AND SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATIONS IN THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN. TODAY, AMY IS GOING TO SPEAK TO THE LAND PLAN SPECIFICS AND FINANCIALS OF THE THOMPSON LAND PLAN. AND FOR ME TODAY, MY ROLE AND THE IDEA FOR ME IS TO STAND UP HERE AS A DEL WEBB PULTEGROUP REPRESENTATIVE AND EXPLAIN THE IMPORTANCE OF SUN CITY, THE TYPE OF RESIDENT THAT LIVES IN SUN CITY, AND JUST OVERALL HIGHLIGHTING ONE OF DEL WEBB'S FLAGSHIP COMMUNITIES ACROSS THE COUNTRY, REALLY IN SUN CITY, TEXAS. THE 500 LOTS IN THE THOMPSON TRACT, IF APPROVED, WILL BE ANNEXED INTO EXISTING SUN CITY. IT'S ALSO WORTH MENTIONING, I THINK THAT 30 YEARS AGO, ALMOST TO THE DAY, IS THE YEAR THAT WE MOVED IN OUR FIRST RESIDENT INTO SUN CITY. SO HAPPY BIRTHDAY, HAPPY BIRTHDAY, HAPPY ANNIVERSARY. WHAT HAVE YOU TO SUN CITY. AND THEN ALSO, JUST AS I ALLUDED TO, I WANTED TO SHARE SOME INFORMATION ABOUT SUN CITY. THERE ARE 9700 HOMES ON THE GROUND TODAY IN SUN CITY, WITH A CURRENT BUILD OUT OF 10,500 HOMES. IF THE THOMPSON TRACT WERE APPROVED IN THE 500, APPROXIMATELY 500 LOTS WERE INCORPORATED. IT WOULD TAKE OUR TOTAL TO JUST OVER 11,000 LOTS. CURRENTLY, TODAY, THERE ARE 16,600 RESIDENTS IN SUN CITY LIVING IN SUN CITY TODAY, WHICH REPRESENTS ABOUT 15% OF THE TOTAL POPULATION OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, WHICH I THINK IS A PRETTY SUBSTANTIAL PIECE OF THE PIE AS IT RELATES TO A PERCENTAGE PERSPECTIVE. THESE TYPE OF RESIDENTS IN SUN CITY, THEY'RE VERY ACTIVE INDIVIDUALS WITHIN THE COMMUNITY, UTILIZING EXISTING AMENITIES IN SUN CITY AND THEN ACTIVE IN THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, AS WELL AS FREQUENTING BUSINESSES, VOLUNTEERISM AND ALL THAT COMES WITH BEING AN ACTIVE RESIDENT IN A CITY. SOME OF OUR RESIDENTS INCLUDE MEMBERS OF THE ELECTED OFFICE THAT ARE WITH US TODAY. THEY'RE ALSO MEMBERS THAT ARE ON CITY ADVISORY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS AND THEN VARIOUS OTHER CIVIC LEADERSHIP ROLES. SO LIKE I[00:30:04]
SAID, THE MEMBERS OF SUN CITY ARE EXTREMELY ACTIVE IN THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN. I WANTED TO HIGHLIGHT SOME OF THE AMENITIES THAT WE HAVE IN GEORGETOWN. I KNOW THAT A LOT OF YOU ARE FAMILIAR WITH THEM. SOME OF YOU UTILIZE THEM. THREE GOLF COURSES IN THE COMMUNITY FOUR AMENITY CENTERS, EIGHT POOLS. YOU GUYS CAN READ ALL OF THIS, BUT COUNTLESS RACKET COURT RACKET COURTS, WHETHER IT'S TENNIS OR PICKLEBALL. BUT FOR ME, YOU KNOW, KIND OF WHERE IT SHINES, IN MY OPINION, WE ALL HAVE OUR OWN IS THAT THERE ARE 20 PLUS MILES OF TRAILS AND BIKE PATHS FOR CITIZENS TO UTILIZE EVERY SINGLE DAY, AND ALSO AS PART OF OUR COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, THERE'S 100 PLUS CLUBS, INCLUDING ART, FITNESS, HOBBIES, SOCIAL GROUPS, WHICH REALLY WHAT THAT AMOUNTS TO IS, YOU KNOW, IT SAYS YEAR ROUND ACTIVITIES. IT'S ESSENTIALLY DAILY ACTIVITIES IN SUN CITY, WHICH IS WHICH IS A PRETTY NEAT THING, YOU KNOW, AS PROUD AS WE AS PROUD AS WE ARE OF THE PAST 30 YEARS OF OPERATIONS IN SUN CITY, WE'RE JUST AS EXCITED ABOUT THE FUTURE TEN YEARS AND BEYOND. IF THE THOMPSON TRACK WERE TO MOVE FORWARD, WE WILL BE ADDING AMENITY AND ANOTHER AMENITY TO THE SITE, WHICH I'LL GET INTO A LITTLE BIT LATER.BUT I ALSO WANTED TO HIGHLIGHT JUST WHAT WE HAVE GOING ON THERE TODAY. AS WE LOOK FORWARD INTO THE FUTURE. WE HAVE CURRENTLY PLANS TO START OUR NEW OVERLOOK AMENITY THIS YEAR IN EXISTING SUN CITY, AND THEN ALSO OUR PAR THREE EXECUTIVE COURSE. WE'RE CALLING THE DEN BY WHITE WING GOLF COURSE IS CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION TODAY, SO IN TOTAL, WHEN, WHEN AND IF THOMPSON WERE TO MOVE FORWARD, IT WOULD BRING OUR AMENITY CENTER COUNT TO SIX, WHICH IS WHICH IS EXCITING FOR US, EXCITING FOR ME PERSONALLY, BEING IN LAND DEVELOPMENT AND LAND ENTITLEMENTS TO GET TO DO THESE FUN THINGS. AND, YOU KNOW, ESSENTIALLY, YOU KNOW, SUN CITY'S IT'S, YOU KNOW, AS YOU CAN READ, IT'S VIBRANT TODAY, IT'S STRONGER TOMORROW AND IT'S EXCEPTIONAL EVERY DAY. AND WITH THAT, I COULDN'T BE MORE PLEASED TO PASS IT ALONG TO AMY PAYNE AND LET HER TELL YOU WHAT WE'RE PLANNING TO DO MORE. SO THANK YOU. THANK YOU RYAN. GOOD AFTERNOON, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. THANK YOU AGAIN FOR ALLOWING US TO COME AND AND VISIT WITH YOU A LITTLE BIT MORE. SO I'M GOING TO GO THROUGH THE SLIDES HERE. SO THIS IS OUR CURRENT LAND PLAN. AND WE REALLY APPRECIATE THE FEEDBACK THAT WE RECEIVED ON THE PROJECT FROM COUNCIL AND STAFF. AND SO I KIND OF WANTED TO GO THROUGH SOME OF THE CHANGES THAT WE HAVE MADE FROM THE LAST TIME WE MET WITH YOU GUYS. WE ADDED THE TEN ACRE COMMERCIAL TRACT HERE ALONG 195, AND WE REDUCED SOME OF THE SINGLE FAMILY DENSITY ACCORDINGLY. WE ADDED A ROUNDABOUT AT THE PRIMARY COMMUNITY ENTRANCE DOWN HERE AT WOODSIDE TRAIL COLLECTOR FOR BETTER TRAFFIC FLOW. WE ADDED THE STREET CONNECTION HERE TO THE NORTH. THESE ARE ALL ITEMS THAT THAT NICK MENTIONED AS WELL FOR BETTER CONNECTIVITY. AND THEN THE PULTE TEAM HERE INCREASED THE AMENITY CENTER SIZE BY TWO ACRES BECAUSE THEY'RE FOCUSING ON WELLNESS AMENITIES THERE ON THIS TRACK THAT'S GOING TO BENEFIT THE THOMPSON TRACT AS WELL AS OVERALL SUN CITY. SO, YOU KNOW, SINCE THE THE THOMPSON TRACT IS BEING PLANNED AS AN EXTENSION TO TO WOODSIDE, I JUST KIND OF WANTED TO COME BACK AND GIVE A BRIEF HISTORY UPDATE ON IT. I KNOW A LOT OF YOU HAVE BEEN HERE WITH US AS WE WE CAME BEFORE YOU GUYS, BUT SOME OF YOU ARE NEW. SO WE BEGAN. BLAKE MCGEE COMPANY BEGAN WORKING ON THE ENTITLEMENTS FOR WOODSIDE IN 2021. WE BUILT THE OFF SITE WATER LINE ALONG RONALD REAGAN. WE PARTNERED WITH ATMOS TO BRING THE GAS TRANSMISSION LINE ALONG RONALD REAGAN WITH PECK FOR THE ELECTRIC. WE BUILT THE OFF SITE WASTEWATER, AND WE CONSTRUCTED ALL OF THIS IN 2024. AND THEN THE FIRST PHASES OF WOODSIDE WERE DELIVERED IN 2025, AND HOME BUILDING STARTED, AND WE HAD OUR FIRST HOMES FOR SALE IN THE SUMMER OF 2025. SO WE'VE BEEN SELLING A LITTLE BIT OVER A YEAR, AND WE'VE DELIVERED THE FIRST PHASE ON OUR WEST SIDE, WHICH IS OUR SUN CITY, WHICH IS OUR WOODSIDE SUN CITY WITH OVER 100 LOTS, AND THEN OUR EAST SIDE, WHICH IS OUR TRADITIONAL PRODUCT WITH OVER 100 LOTS AS WELL. SO ONE OF THE THINGS, OBVIOUSLY, SINCE I'M GOING TO GO TO OUR FINANCIAL PAGE HERE, THE MARKET THAT WE'VE BEEN IN FOR THE LAST, YOU KNOW, YEAR AND A HALF THAT WE'VE WE'VE OPENED THIS NEW COMMUNITY HASN'T BEEN THE MOST ROBUST MARKET. AND SO ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE WANTED TO HIGHLIGHT WAS THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN WHAT'S HAPPENING WITH OUR TRADITIONAL HOMES IN WOODSIDE, WHICH IS LISTED HERE AS WOODSIDE PHASE A VERSUS OUR
[00:35:07]
WOODSIDE, SUN CITY HOMES AND JUST SUN CITY IN GENERAL. SO AS I MENTIONED, WE HAD OUR GRAND OPENING, PULTE DID AND OUR BUILDERS IN JUNE OF 2025. SO WE HAVE SOLD IN OUR TRADITIONAL PRODUCT, APPROXIMATELY 1.7 HOUSES A MONTH, SO ROUGHLY 20 HOUSES A YEAR. AND THE AVERAGE SALES PRICE IS $450,000 FOR THOSE HOMES VERSUS THE SUN CITY. AND THIS IS JUST ALL OF SUN CITY. THIS INCLUDES WOODSIDE. THEY'VE HAD 188 SALES FOR THE YEAR, ROUGHLY ALMOST 16 HOUSES A MONTH. THE AVERAGE SALES PRICE IS $700,000. SO ONE OF THE THINGS WE REALLY WANTED TO HIGHLIGHT OF WHY WE'RE BRINGING THIS PROJECT TO YOU AS AN ACTIVE ADULT SUN CITY PROJECT, IS BECAUSE OF THE ABSORPTION THAT WE'RE SEEING. WE'RE JUST NOT SEEING THE ABSORPTION IN THE TRADITIONAL HOUSING MARKET. YOU KNOW, HERE IN WOODSIDE, ALL OF OUR PROJECTS AS A WHOLE, THE ABSORPTION IS LESS. IN THE LAST SEVERAL YEARS, I EVEN KNOW LIKE PERMITTING DOWN IN GEORGETOWN, I BELIEVE ON THIS WEST SIDE IS DOWN, YOU KNOW, OVER 20%. SO WE'RE JUST DEALING WITH A DIFFERENT MARKET. BUT SO WHEN WE LOOK AT THE TAX REVENUE, THE ANNUAL TAX REVENUE, WE. THAT'S WHAT THIS $33,000 NUMBER IS. IF WE TAKE THE MATH OF THE SELLING APPROXIMATELY 20 HOUSES A YEAR VERSUS THE 16 HOUSES AT THE $700,000 HOME PRICE, GENERATING THE 464,000 OF ANNUAL TAX REVENUE. ONE OF THE THINGS TO NOTE WOULD BE AT ULTIMATE BUILD OUT RIGHT NOW, THIS PROJECT, THE ASSESSED VALUATION IS ESTIMATED TO BE AROUND 350 MILLION AND AND GENERATE ABOUT 1.2 MILLION IN ANNUAL TAX REVENUE FOR THIS. FOR THIS PROJECT. ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE ALSO RESEARCHED FROM YOUR COMMENTS WAS HOW OFTEN THE HOMES IN SUN CITY ARE SOLD. AND SO WE WERE ABLE TO GET THAT DATA WITH SUN CITY. ON AVERAGE, THE HOUSES TURN OVER EVERY 8 TO 9 YEARS. SO WE WERE ALSO ABLE TO LOOK AT THIS AVERAGE SALES PRICE DIFFERENCE. IF YOU WERE TO LOOK AT THE THE OVERALL VALUE OF THE 450 000 IN REGULAR, REGULAR TRADITIONAL HOUSING VERSUS THE 700 000, IT TAKES ABOUT TEN YEARS TO CATCH UP TO THAT VALUE. SO IMPORTANT TO TO NOTE THAT GAP THERE. YOU KNOW, OUR HOMES IN WOODSIDE ARE VERY SIMILAR ON BOTH THE WOODSIDE TRADITIONAL SIDE AS WELL AS THE SUN CITY SIDE. IT'S JUST THE AMENITIES AND JUST THAT SUN CITY NAME AND THOSE AMENITY PACKAGE THAT INCREASES THE THE SALES VALUE ON THERE. SO BEFORE I TURN IT BACK OVER TO RYAN, ONE THING I WANTED TO NOTE NICK HAD MENTIONED IS THAT THIS PROJECT IS GOING TO BE BUILDING AN 18 INCH WATER LINE ALONG 195. IT'S ABOUT OVER A MILE LONG FOR OUR PROJECT IN PARTICULAR, WE PROBABLY WOULD ONLY NEED A 12 INCH LINE, BUT THE CITY HAS REQUESTED THAT WE UPSIZE THAT LINE TO AN 18 INCH LINE TO HELP BRING WATER TO THE CORRIDOR.OUT HERE, WE ALSO HAVE WOODSIDE TRAIL COLLECTOR IMPROVEMENTS WITH A TRAFFIC SIGNAL ON 195 AND DECELERATION LANES. THOSE TURN LANE IMPROVEMENTS AND SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS ARE ABOUT $1 MILLION, AND THEY WOULD BE ACCELERATED WITH THIS THOMPSON PROJECT VERSUS THE WOODSIDE PROJECT, JUST BECAUSE THE MARKET THAT WE'RE IN AND BECAUSE OF THE THE SALES THAT WE'RE SEEING OUT THERE. ALSO IN ADDITION, REGARDING FEES, THIS PROJECT WOULD GENERATE $900,000 IN TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES, $900,000 IN PARKLAND FEES, AND $11 MILLION IN WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES. SO IN ADDITION TO THE SEVEN AND A HALF ACRE AMENITY SITE, I BELIEVE PULTE HAS RYAN WILL TALK ABOUT IT, BUT IT'S 11 MILLION OR SOMETHING, SOMETHING LIKE THAT, 12 MILLION. BUT WE'LL BE PAYING THE $900,000 IN PARKLAND FEES THAT GO TOWARDS THE CITY PARKS AS WELL. AND THEN ONE OTHER ITEM WAS COMMENT WAS RELATED TO POTENTIALLY THE ADDITIONAL USE FOR FIRE AND EMS REGARDING OUR ACTIVE ADULT POPULATION. SO ONE OF THE
[00:40:02]
THINGS THAT WE RESEARCHED IS IN OUR ETJ PROJECTS AND OUR MUD, WE PAY A PER LOT CIP FEE. IT'S LIKE $630. WE PAY IT IN THE ETJ. SO PULTE AND OUR TEAM ARE PROPOSING THAT WE WORK WITH STAFF TO COME UP WITH A PER LOT FEE, THAT THIS IN CITY MUD WILL PAY TO OFFSET SOME ADDITIONAL FIRE AND EMS COSTS. SO THAT COULD HELP WITH THAT AS WELL. SO I THINK THAT'S, THAT'S ALL OF THE QUESTIONS THAT I WANTED TO GO OVER. AND THEN I'M GOING TO TURN IT BACK OVER TO RYAN, WHERE HE CAN GO THROUGH SOME OF THE OTHER PIECES OF OUR PROJECT. ARE YOU SAYING A LOT FEE PER SALE OF LOT OR IS IT AN ONGOING FEE? THAT IS, IT'S USUALLY PAID LIKE WITH A BUILDING PERMIT.OKAY, OKAY. WE DO THAT IN OUR ETJ MUD. SO WE THOUGHT THAT MIGHT HELP OFFSET THOSE COSTS.
THANK YOU. AND CAN I ASK YOU JUST ONE MORE QUESTION? GO AHEAD. AMANDA. NO. GO AHEAD.
YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT IMPACT FEES AND I WAS GOING TO BRING THAT UP. TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES. DO YOU HAVE THE COST OF WHERE Y'ALL ARE NOW. SO 900 000 IS WHAT I HAVE ON THAT. AND, AND CURRENTLY IN YOUR IN YOUR PLAN, IT DOESN'T LOOK LIKE THERE ARE ANY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS IN THIS AREA. IT LOOKS LIKE RONALD REAGAN IMPROVEMENTS ARE RELATED TO WILLIAMSON COUNTY. WE WE VISITED WITH THEM. SO IT WOULD JUST BE OVER AND ABOVE FEES THAT WE'D BE PAYING JUST TO THE CITY FOR JUST GENERAL IN GENERAL. OKAY, THANKS. ON YOUR FINANCIAL SLIDE, THE AVERAGE SALES PRICE, ARE PEOPLE PAYING A $250,000 PREMIUM FOR AGE RESTRICTION, OR ARE WE TALKING DIFFERENTIALS IN THE TYPE OF HOUSING THAT THEY'RE BUYING? YEAH, I'LL LET RYAN ANSWER THAT A LITTLE BIT MORE. BUT IT'S BASICALLY BECAUSE OF THE SUN CITY DEL WEBB NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE AMENITY PACKAGE THAT IT'S TIED TO. OKAY, SO COMPARABLE HOMES JUST AT A PREMIUM. AND I DON'T KNOW WHO THE MOST APPROPRIATE IS, BUT ON THE COMMERCIAL PIECE, I LOVE THE IDEA OF THE COMMERCIAL BUFFERING RESIDENTS FROM 195, BUT DO WE HAVE A VISION FOR C1C2? WHAT WHAT KIND OF COMMERCIAL ARE YOU GUYS ENVISIONING THERE? YOU KNOW, TYPICALLY ON OUR PROJECTS LIKE THIS, THE COMMERCIAL IS JUST DAYCARE OFFICE. IT'S ALL RELATED TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL. PERFECT. THANK YOU.
GOT A CLARIFICATION ON THE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE. YOU MENTIONED 900,000. IS THAT THE FULL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE OR IS THAT JUST. I WAS FOR SOME REASON, THINKING THAT YOU GUYS WERE PUTTING IN A SIGNAL UP TO TWO IF REQUIRED. IS THAT NOT CORRECT? WE ARE PUTTING IN A SIGNAL AT 195 AND ALSO PUTTING A SIGNAL AT RONALD REAGAN, AND THEN THE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE IS PAID. ON TOP OF THAT, THE ADDITIONAL 900,000 ON TOP OF THAT. THANK YOU, AMY, ON THE AMENITY CENTER IS THE ONE THAT THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT. WOULD THAT BE SOLELY FOR SUN CITY RESIDENTS AND AND THESE RESIDENTS, IF THEY WERE ADDED INTO SUN CITY OR WERE THE WOODSIDE FOLKS ALSO HAVE ACCESS TO THAT AMENITY CENTER? WOODSIDE TRADITIONAL DOESN'T HAVE ACCESS TO. SO THIS WOULD JUST BE AN ADDITIONAL SUN CITY AMENITY CENTER. OKAY. OTHER QUESTIONS. GO AHEAD. OH, ONE MORE REAL QUICK. GO AHEAD. SORRY. YES, I HAVE A WHOLE LIST OF THEM. OKAY. YOU WANT TO LET HIM FINISH AND THEN GO THROUGH? SURE. LET'S DO THAT. JUST TO FURTHER ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, MR. STEWART, THE HOMES ARE VERY SIMILAR IN NATURE. THE FLOOR PLANS DO DIFFER IN LAYOUT. LARGER BATHROOMS IN THE SUN CITY, DIFFERENT FLOOR PLANS THAT ARE MORE DESIRABLE FOR THIS CLIENTELE. SO JUST TO HELP ANSWER THAT QUESTION AND THEN CONTINUING ON THE PRESENTATION, JUST WANTED TO HIGHLIGHT SOME ENTRY CONCEPTS HERE, WHICH FURTHER REITERATES THAT THIS SIMPLY, NOT SIMPLY THIS JUST IS A CONTINUATION OF SUN CITY. SO THIS ENTRY MONUMENT MAINTAINS WHAT OUR LAND PLANNING AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SCC PLANNING DOES IS MODERN HILL COUNTRY, SO THIS PROBABLY LOOKS FAMILIAR TO THE RESIDENTS CURRENTLY AND THEN RESIDENTS OF SUN CITY AS WELL. NO REAL CHANGE. AND WE UTILIZE NATIVE LANDSCAPING AS MUCH AS WE CAN ACROSS THE 5500 ACRES. WE FEEL AS IF IT'S DESIRABLE FOR THE END USER AND ALSO DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES LESS SOD THAN TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOODS.
ESSENTIALLY A CONTINUATION. AGAIN, JUST TO REITERATE OF SUN CITY AND THEN GETTING INTO THE AMENITIES, THE PROPOSED THOMPSON AMENITY CONCEPT IS SHOWN HERE. AND ALSO SHOWN HERE ON THE LEFT IS A COMPARISON TO A TRADITIONAL SINGLE FAMILY NEIGHBORHOOD. SO YOU'LL SEE IN THE THOMPSON TRACT. AS AMY MENTIONED, WHEN WE FIRST CAME UP HERE, I GOSH, IT HAD TO HAVE BEEN MORE THAN A MONTH AGO. TIME'S FLYING. BUT PROBABLY TWO MONTHS AGO, WE DID INCREASE THE PROPOSED THOMPSON AMENITY SITE TWO ACRES TO 7.4 ACRES. IF THIS WERE A TRADITIONAL SINGLE FAMILY NEIGHBORHOOD, ESSENTIALLY WE'D BE DOING ABOUT A TWO AND A HALF ACRE SITE FOR
[00:45:01]
A LOT COUNT, SUCH AS 500 THOMPSON TRACT WITH A SMALL POOL, A PLAYGROUND, AN OPEN AIR RESTROOM BUILDING. SO WHEN YOU WHEN YOU ADD THE DEL WEBB SUN CITY FACTOR TO IT, AND THEN THE IN-CITY MUD ON TOP OF IT, WE'RE ABLE TO GO ABOVE AND BEYOND WHAT'S REQUIRED AND DO SOMETHING LIKE YOU SEE HERE WITH A WITH ANOTHER R SIX, 10 OR 6 AMENITY BUILDING, THIS ONE BEING OVER 10,000FTā !S. COST TO BE DETERMINED. BUT AGAIN, YOU KNOW, THIS THIS IS WHY WE THINK THAT THESE SUN CITY HOMES, NOT WHY WE THINK THIS IS A BIG PART OF THE REASON WHY THESE HOMES HAVE MORE VALUE. IT'S THE AMENITIES THAT WE OFFER WITHIN SUN CITY IS JUST ANOTHER REASON WHY. AND THEN, YOU KNOW, ESSENTIALLY, I GUESS IN CLOSING FOR THE PRESENTATION, I KNOW MR. BUTLER HAS QUESTIONS, BUT WE COULDN'T BE MORE EXCITED AT THE THOUGHT OF CONTINUING THE LIFE IN SUN CITY. AND TRUTHFULLY, WE THOROUGHLY ENJOY WORKING WITH THE BLAKE MCGEE COMPANY AS THE DEVELOPER AGAIN. OUR DECADES OF EXPERIENCE HERE. STAFF FROM PULTE GROUP THAT'S HERE. WE LIKE TO THINK OUR NAMES ARE HELD IN RESPECTFUL MANNER WITH CITY STAFF THAT WE WORK WITH EVERY SINGLE DAY OVER THESE PAST 30 YEARS. SO APPRECIATE THE TIME TODAY. AND OF COURSE, AMY AND I WILL BE HERE ALONG WITH OUR ENGINEER. AND HOWEVER, WE NEED TO ANSWER THE QUESTIONS. WE'RE HERE TO DO THAT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR YOUR PRESENTATION. SO WE'VE TALKED ABOUT IT BEFORE. THE THE AMOUNT OF THE RATE FOR THE MUD. YOU'RE STILL PROPOSING $0.55.AND. IT'S I CALLED IT A HIDDEN TAX. AND I UNDERSTAND BUYER BEWARE, YOU SHOULD DO YOUR DUE DILIGENCE. SO I WENT TO SUN CITY PULTE TO SEE WHAT YOUR PULTE MORTGAGE ESTIMATOR SAYS ABOUT TAXES. AND WHENEVER YOU CALCULATE THE TAX RATE THEY ARE IN THEIR ESTIMATOR AND YOUR ESTIMATOR. YOU'RE USING A TAX RATE OF 0.1.74 FOR EVERYTHING MORE OR LESS. THAT'S INCLUDING THE THE SCHOOLS, COUNTY, EVERYTHING ELSE. WHEREAS IF I GO TO A PERSON THAT LIVES RIGHT DOWN THE STREET FROM WHERE THIS PARTICULAR HOUSE WAS PULLED OFF OF, THEY'RE USING A RATE OF 2.48. THAT'S A BIG DIFFERENCE. YOUR ESTIMATOR IS NOT DOES NOT SEEM TO BE TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE MUD TAX. SO WHENEVER IF I'M A BUYER AND I'M COMING AND LOOKING AND COMPARING TAXES, COMPARING WHAT MY MORTGAGE IS GOING TO BE, IT LOOKS LIKE TO ME YOUR ESTIMATOR IS NOT TAKE YOUR ESTIMATOR IS NOT TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE MUD TAX. AND THAT BOTHERS ME, ESPECIALLY WHEN THE MUD TAX IS $0.55. THE CITY TAX IS ONLY $0.35. THAT'S A 20 CENT INCREASE. THAT THAT PEOPLE ARE NOT THINKING ABOUT PAYING. AND IT'S IT'S A HIDDEN TAX. AND IT BOTHERS ME FOR THE PEOPLE THAT ARE BUYING. NOW, THEN I WANT TO LOOK AT THE OTHER SIDE OF IT. THE PEOPLE THAT LIVE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE CREEK LIKE I DO. SO YOU HAVE THIS TAX THAT IS NOT EXACTLY APPARENT WHEN YOU GO TO ANY OF THESE SITES TO COMPARE COST OF HOUSES AND EVERYTHING, IT'S NOT APPARENT. SO IF I'M AN EXISTING HOMEOWNER, I HAVE TO DECREASE THE COST OF MY HOUSE TO TRY TO MAKE IT MATCH YOURS. SO INSTEAD OF GROWTH PAYING FOR GROWTH, WHICH IS WHAT WE'RE SHOOTING FOR, BY ALLOWING YOU TO CHARGE SO MUCH FOR A MUD TAX, YOU'RE DECREASING THE COST OF YOUR HOUSE AND THE UPFRONT COST, NOT IN THE TOTAL COST, BUT IN THE UPFRONT COST. AND THE PERSON THAT LIVES ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE CREEK, THEY HAVE TO DECREASE THEIRS. SO THEY'RE LOSING VALUE. IF THEY HAVE TO MOVE OUT TO GO TO AN ASSISTED LIVING OR SOMETHING, THEY'RE LOSING VALUE. AND SO THIS HIGH RATE IS NOT ONLY SOMETHING THAT THE PERSON BUYING THE HOUSE NEEDS TO BE COGNIZANT OF, WHICH A LOT OF THEM AREN'T. IT'S HURTING THE PEOPLE ON THE OTHER SIDE ALSO. SO YOUR RATE BOTHERS ME. I THINK THE RATE NEEDS TO BE MUCH, MUCH LESS. I SEE YOU HAVE A FEW THINGS HERE 12 INCH MAIN TO AN 18 INCH MAIN. SO THERE'S SOME THINGS THAT. YEAH, OKAY. BUT I DON'T, I CANNOT SEE WHERE $0.55 IS CLOSE TO JUSTIFIED. AND I WOULD PROPOSE THAT WE WOULD LIMIT MUD TAX IN CITY TO A THIRD OF THE CITY TAXES, MORE OR LESS, UNLESS YOU CAN COME BACK AND SAY EXACTLY WHAT THE ADDITIONAL TAXES ARE FOR. AND THAT MEANS STARTING FROM ZERO, NOT FROM THE $0.12, BUT WHAT ALL THIS MUD TAX IS GOING TO PAY FOR THE AGE RESTRICTION. I UNDERSTAND THAT YOU HAD A LOT OF GOOD POINTS. OUR SENIORS ARE VERY IMPORTANT TO THE COMMUNITY. THEY VOLUNTEER, THEY SPEND MONEY. THEY DON'T USE THE ROADS AS MUCH AS A LOT OF PEOPLE. IT'S A FAIRLY SAFE COMMUNITY. THEY MAY USE EMS A LITTLE BIT MORE, BUT
[00:50:02]
THEY'RE VERY GOOD FOR THE COMMUNITY. WHENEVER I EAT FOOD, SALT IS GOOD FOR MY FOOD. I LIKE SALT, BUT IF I PUT TOO MUCH SALT ON THERE, IT RUINS IT. AND MY CONCERN IS WE'RE GETTING TO A PLACE WE'VE GOT 30%, I THINK, IN THE CITY OF SENIORS AND THEIR TAX RATES. I DON'T SEE WHY WE NEED TO HAVE MORE AND MORE AGE RESTRICTED. I THINK WE HAVE PLENTY OF AGE RESTRICTED. AGAIN, THEY'RE GOOD. NOTHING AGAINST THEM. BUT THERE'S GOT TO BE A LIMIT TO IT.AND SO I'D LIKE TO SEE THAT NOT BE AGE RESTRICTED. THE AMENITY CENTER PEOPLE HAVE BEEN TALKING TO ME AND THEY TALK ABOUT THERE WAS AN AMENITY CENTER THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE STARTED SOME TIME AGO, AND IT HASN'T STARTED NOW. WHEN YOU GET TO BE TO A CERTAIN AGE, YOU LOOK AT LIFE A LITTLE DIFFERENTLY. YOU LOOK HOW MANY MORE YEARS OF ACTIVE YEARS, GOOD YEARS DO I HAVE? AND WHENEVER YOU DELAY SOMETHING, IF YOU'RE THINKING, WELL, I'VE GOT 8 OR 10 MORE GOOD YEARS AND SOMETHING'S DELAYED THREE MONTHS, SIX MONTHS, A YEAR, TWO YEARS, AND ALL OF A SUDDEN THAT THING IS SHRINKING VERY QUICKLY. AND THE TIME THAT YOU HAVE TO ENJOY CERTAIN THINGS. SO IF YOU HAVE AN AMENITY CENTER AND YOU'RE TELLING THEM YOU'RE GOING TO START, THEY EXPECT YOU TO DO THAT. AND THAT'S ANOTHER CONCERN FOR ME. AND I HAD A QUESTION ON GO TO SLIDE 10 OR 11. OKAY. IN THE BOTTOM CENTER, THERE'S A BIG BEAR SPOT, WHICH IF YOU GO BACK TO SLIDE SIX, IT SHOWS IT AS AN AMENITY CENTER. I BELIEVE IF I'VE GOT THAT RIGHT, WHAT HAPPENED TO THAT? HELP ME UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT. GO BACK HERE. GO BACK. YEAH. NO GO THE ONE. SO IN THE VERY CENTER THERE'S AN AMENITY CENTER. A PURPLE THING HERE. YES. GOTCHA. THAT'S THE AMENITY CENTER FOR THE WOODSIDE COMMUNITY. OKAY, SO. YEAH. AND THE OTHER PLOT, IT JUST DIDN'T SHOW ANYTHING. YOU HAD ALL THE HOUSES OUTLINED. YOU DIDN'T SAY ANYTHING IN THAT SPOT. SO THAT WAS CONFUSING TO ME. SO THAT'S OKAY. OH, AND THE OTHER THING IS THAT YOU WANT TO TIE THIS TO SUN CITY. AND I KNOW WE ALREADY HAVE A LITTLE, A FEW PEOPLE ON THE OTHER SIDE, BUT AS YOU GET OLDER AND OLDER, YOU DON'T LIKE TO GET OUT ON HIGHWAYS.
SECONDARY ROADS ARE ONE THING, BUT TO GET OUT ON RONALD REAGAN OR 195, AND EVERY TIME YOU WANT TO USE ANY AMENITIES EXCEPT FOR THE ONE THAT'S RIGHT NEXT TO YOU, YOU'VE GOT TO GET OUT ON THE ROAD. OR IF WE NEED TO GO OVER TO THE AMENITY CENTER HERE, THAT IS A SIGNIFICANT BARRIER TO TO THE PEOPLE THAT LIVE IN SUN CITY. AND THAT CONCERNS ME. I'M NOT SURE WHAT WE NEED TO DO ABOUT IT, BUT THAT THAT IS A A PROBLEM THAT I HAVE. SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR LISTENING.
SURE. I HAVE A SEVERAL RESPONSES. GO AHEAD MYSELF AND THEN I'M SURE AMY DOES AS WELL.
BUT I REALLY DO APPRECIATE YOU POINTING OUT WHAT SEEMINGLY MIGHT BE MISLEADING INFORMATION ON THE WEBSITE. THAT WOULD BE NEWS TO ME. I'M NOT IN MY ROLE. CLICKING AROUND OUR MORTGAGE CALCULATOR. NO, I APPRECIATE THAT. IT'S SOMETHING WE TAKE SERIOUSLY, AND WE'LL LOOK INTO THAT AND REPORT BACK ON THAT. SO THANK YOU FOR POINTING THAT OUT. TO FURTHER CONTINUE THAT POINT OR THAT CONVERSATION. IT GOT BROUGHT UP LAST TIME AT WORKSHOP WHERE, YOU KNOW, DO OUR END USERS OR POTENTIAL BUYERS, ARE THEY KNOWLEDGEABLE OF THE FACT THAT THEY'RE PURCHASING IN A MUD AND HOW DOES THAT WORK? RIGHT. WELL, OUR SALES CONSULTANTS AT PULTE, WE TALK ABOUT THE TOTAL TAX RATE THAT THESE BUYERS WILL BE ENTERING INTO AT AT THE INITIAL CONVERSATION. NOT ONLY DO WE TALK ABOUT IT THEN, BUT WE TALK ABOUT IT, AND THEY ARE REQUIRED TO SIGN DISCLOSURES WHEN THEY GO UNDER CONTRACT, WHEN THEY BEGIN TO PURCHASE THE HOME AND THEN AT THE CLOSING TABLE, THEY ALSO HAVE EVEN MORE DISCLOSURES THAT THEY'RE ACKNOWLEDGING THAT THEY'RE IN A DISTRICT, IN THIS CASE OF THE THOMPSON TRACT, WHICH WOULD BE A MUD DISTRICT.
SO AGAIN, THAT'S THAT'S KIND OF HOW WE OPERATE AS IT IS TODAY. AND LIKE I SAID, YOUR COMMENTS ABOUT OUR WEBSITE, WE WILL LOOK INTO IT AND GET BACK TO YOU IN THAT REGARD. AS FAR AS CONNECTIVITY GOES, I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WANT TO HANDLE THAT ONE. AMY, I JUST SO I UNDERSTAND, BEN, YOU'RE WORRIED ABOUT GETTING THROUGH THE COMMUNITY OR HELP ME UNDERSTAND THE CONNECTIVITY QUESTION. SO. TO GET FROM THE OTHER SIDE OF THE CREEK, AS I CALL IT, TO THE MAIN PART OF SUN CITY, I'VE EITHER GOT ON GET ON RONALD REAGAN WITH A CURRENTLY A 65
[00:55:03]
MILE AN HOUR SPEED LIMIT, OR 195, WHICH IS 65 MILE AN HOUR SPEED LIMIT. A LOT OF PEOPLE PREFER NOT TO GET OUT ON ROADS THAT HAVE THOSE HIGH SPEED LIMITS, ESPECIALLY WHEN THERE'S PEOPLE THAT ARE NOT MEETING THE SPEED LIMIT AND GOING EVEN EVEN FASTER. SO THAT IS A BARRIER.AND IF YOU LIVE ON ONE SIDE AND NEED TO GET TO THE OTHER SIDE, IT MAY NOT SEEM LIKE A BIG DEAL.
BUT UNLESS YOU GET IN YOUR GOLF CART, YOU'VE GOT TO GET OUT ON A MAJOR ROAD, A 65 MILE AN HOUR ROAD. AND THAT THAT BOTHERS SOME PEOPLE AS AS WE ARE NOT AS YOUNG AS WE USED TO BE. SO THAT THAT IS MY CONCERN. I UNDERSTAND WE HAVE THE THE GOLF CART PATH, AND OUR PREACHER WAS SOON GOING TO BE GOING FROM THE WORSHIP PLACE TO WOODSIDE TO GIVE A SERMON AND THEN COMING BACK, AND HE CAN EITHER TAKE THE SHORTCUT ON GOLF CART, OR HE'S GOT TO GET OUT ON ONE OF THOSE ROADS TO COME ALL THE WAY AROUND TO GET TO ANOTHER PART OF SUN CITY. SO THERE'S IT'S A SIGNIFICANT BARRIER IS NOT IMPENETRABLE, BUT IT IS SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT. YEAH.
UNDERSTOOD. AND AMY KIND OF ALLUDED TO THE THE WOODSIDE, CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG.
WOODSIDE TRAIL BOULEVARD. I'M PROBABLY BUTCHERING THE NAME. YOU KNOW THE THOMPSON TRACK COMING ONLINE SOONER GETS YOU THE CONNECTIVITY TO 195 QUICKER. IF WE WERE TO FORWARD WITH THE THOMPSON TRACK, AND THEN ALSO AGAIN, FROM AN ACCESSIBILITY STANDPOINT, AMENITIES BEING CONSTRUCTED ON, AS YOU REFER TO THIS SIDE OF THE CREEK, I THINK WOULD HELP WITH THE CONNECTIVITY ISSUE AS WELL. IS MY OPINION OF THE THE MATTER HERE? DOES THAT HELP ANSWER YOUR CONCERN? THE QUESTION IS HOW TO GET BETWEEN A AND B WITHOUT GETTING ON 195 OR RONALD REAGAN. YES, WE CAN GET OUT ON RONALD REAGAN, AND THOSE TRUCKS ARE COMING DOWN THERE AND THEIR TRUCKS, BIG TRUCKS. THEY HAD FOUR ACCIDENTS THERE AND TEN DAYS A COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO. PEOPLE JUST DON'T WANT TO GET OUT ON THAT ROAD IF THEY DON'T HAVE TO. AND WE LIKE TO, YOU KNOW, GO TO OUR DIFFERENT FRIENDS HOUSES AND GO TO THE AMENITIES CENTER AND FORCING PEOPLE OUT ONTO THAT ROAD. IS A CONCERN. IT'S NOT AN IMPENETRABLE, BUT IT'S, IT'S A CONCERN, RIGHT? AND PACE HELPS WITH CONNECTIVITY. WITH THE WOODSIDE DEVELOPMENT CONTINUING THE THOMPSON ADDITION THAT WE NEED THE SPEED AND VELOCITY TO CONTINUE BUILDING THESE ROADS AND CONNECTION POINTS. IS THERE A WAY TO GET ACROSS WHAT I CALL THE CREEK WITHOUT GETTING OUT ON 195 OR RONALD REAGAN? BESIDES THE GOLF CART? GO AHEAD. YEAH. BEN, THANK YOU AGAIN FOR THOSE COMMENTS. APPRECIATE THAT. WE DID ORIGINALLY IN WOODSIDE WHEN WE WERE IN TITLING IT IN 2021. THAT WAS A COMMENT THAT CAME UP, WHICH IS WHY WE DID ADD THE GOLF CART PATH, YOU KNOW, TO CONNECT THE TWO COMMUNITIES. BUT BECAUSE OF THE THERE'S A WILLIAMSON COUNTY KARST FEATURE THAT'S UP ALONG RONALD REAGAN THAT'S PRETTY LARGE. THEN THERE'S A THERE'S PRETTY SIGNIFICANT TOPOGRAPHY, DRAINAGE. THERE WASN'T A WAY, YOU KNOW, TO CONNECT DIRECTLY INTO, INTO SON CITY AND NOT HAVE, YOU KNOW, COME OFF OF RONALD REAGAN. BUT SO THAT'S WHY WE ADDED THE GOLF CART PATH TO MAKE THAT CONNECTIVITY. SO YOU'RE SELLING SON CITY AS GETTING MORE. YOU CAN GET MORE MONEY FOR A HOUSE IF IT'S SON CITY PLUS A FEW AMENITIES, YOU GET MORE MONEY FOR IT. BUT YET THEY DON'T REALLY HAVE THE SAME CONNECTIVITY THAT I DO ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE CREEK. THEY CAN GET THERE, BUT IT'S NOT THE SAME. AND PEOPLE DON'T UNDERSTAND THAT. AND OH, BY THE WAY, BECAUSE YOU CAN GET MORE MONEY FOR THAT. IT SEEMS EVEN MORE TO ME THAT YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO REDUCE YOUR MUD RATE BECAUSE YOU CAN SELL YOUR HOUSES FOR MORE. SO THEREFORE YOU DON'T NEED AS MUCH HELP WITH THE MUD RATE. YEAH. THANK YOU. YEAH. THANK YOU FOR THAT COMMENT. BUT RIGHT NOW, THAT'S, THAT'S ONLY THE CONNECTIVITY THAT WE HAVE FOR THIS PROJECT. YEAH. ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS BEFORE WE GET FEEDBACK. I THINK I THINK I GOT A FEW QUESTIONS FOR YOU NICK. SO I'M LOOKING AT THE AGENDA FROM JUNE 28TH, 2022 IS WHENEVER WE VOTED ON THE CONSENT FOR THE WOODSIDE MUD.
SO THIS THIS WOULD BE AN I'M GOING TO CALL IT ANNEXATION INTO THAT EXISTING MUD. SO SO WHATEVER THE TERMS AND AGREEMENTS WERE WITHIN THAT CONSENT OF THAT MUD OR WHAT WOULD APPLY TO THIS PROPERTY AS WELL? YES. I MEAN, TYPICALLY, I MEAN, WHEN THERE'S AN ADDITION LIKE THIS, IF WE NEED TO ADD ADDITIONAL THINGS ONTO THIS, WE CAN. THE TIMING OF THAT ONE WAS UNIQUE IN THAT IT WAS PRIOR TO THE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES BEING ADOPTED. SO ANY ANYTHING THAT'S CURRENTLY BEING DEVELOPED IN WOODSIDE OTHER THAN THE, THEY DO HAVE A PIECE
[01:00:02]
OF MULTIFAMILY THAT THEY CAN DEVELOP. THE MULTIFAMILY IS THE ONLY THING THAT WILL PAY TRANSPORTATION. WHAT I WAS GOING TO ASK ABOUT, BECAUSE ABOUT THE 900,000 IS ROUGHLY THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED TIF TIMES THE NUMBER OF MULTIFAMILY UNITS IS ABOUT 900,000. SO I FIGURED THAT WAS KIND OF WHERE THEY WERE GETTING THE NUMBER FROM BASED ON TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES PAID ON THE HIGH DENSITY MULTIFAMILY AREA, BUT I THINK I'M NOT SPEAKING FOR I THINK AMY WAS PROBABLY CALCULATING THE ADDITIONAL HOMES THAT WILL BE ADDED. I THINK YOU WERE SAYING. YEAH. SO THAT THIS WOULD BE WHAT SHE WOULD. AND I'M, I HAVE NOT VERIFIED WHAT THE FEES WOULD ADD UP TO. THAT'S FINE. BUT THE THAT WOULD BE ADDITIONAL TO WHATEVER THAT MULTIFAMILY 900,000 THEN WOULD BE. SO BASICALLY THEY'RE PAYING IMPACT FEES ON THESE HOME TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES ON THESE HOMES WHERE THEY MAY NOT BE IN THE OTHER SECTION. CORRECT. AT THIS POINT. AND THE CURRENT AGREEMENT, AND THEY MAY BE PLANNING TO DO BOTH SIGNALS, WHICH IS GREAT. THE CURRENT AGREEMENT ONLY REQUIRES ONE OF THE TWO SIGNALS TO BE PAID FOR BY THE DEVELOPER. SO THAT IS SOMETHING IF IF THIS DID MOVE FORWARD, SOMETHING THAT WE WOULD WANT TO LOCK IN INTO THE AGREEMENT IS THAT BOTH SIGNALS WOULD BE PAID FOR. OKAY. AND THEY'VE AGREED TO THAT. WE HAVE NOT TALKED THROUGH THAT, BUT THAT'S SOMETHING WE WOULD WANT TO WE WOULD WANT TO INCLUDE TRAFFIC SIGNAL REQUIRED. THE THE OTHER PART. AND SO LIKE THE WHEN THE DEBT CAN BE ISSUED, LET'S SEE HERE. SO 80 MILLION BOND LIMIT AMOUNT THAT OBVIOUSLY WOULD GO UP WITH THE ADDITION OF THIS PROPERTY. AND IT WAS A 25 YEAR MATURITY AND THEN TEN YEAR LIMIT ON ISSUANCE OF BONDS THAT THAT WOULD KIND OF RESET WITH THIS AGREEMENT, BUT ONLY FOR THIS. OR WILL WE BE CALLING OUT THIS SECTION SEPARATELY IN THE MODIFIED AGREEMENT? WE YEAH, WE WOULD NEED TO TALK. WE HAVEN'T GOTTEN INTO ALL THOSE DETAILS WITH THEM ON HOW THAT WOULD WORK. EXACTLY. BUT YEAH, IF THERE WAS ANY CHANGE THAT NEEDED TO BE MADE, WE WOULD CALL THAT OUT IN THIS AGREEMENT. I WOULD BASICALLY, I WOULDN'T WANT TO CHANGE THE TERMS ON WHAT WOULD WANT TO RESET THE DEBT. ALLOWANCES, IF YOU WILL, IN THE INITIAL AGREEMENT FOR THAT INITIAL PART WITH THIS. I MEAN, I CAN UNDERSTAND IF WE WANT TO START THE CLOCK SEPARATE FOR FOR THIS PROPERTY OR THIS SECTION. BUT THE OTHER SECTION, IF BOND DEBT HAS ALREADY BEEN ISSUED, IT SHOULD APPLY AS IT WAS DESIGNED ORIGINALLY AND AGREED TO. ALSO, THERE WAS A $630 PER LOT CIP FEE FOR FIRE TO SUPPORT FIRE AND EMS IN THE LAST AGREEMENT IS WHAT IT WAS STATED HERE. I'M LOOKING AT THE PRESENTATION, SO YOU TAKE MY WORD FOR IT. YEAH. SO THAT'S WHAT AMY WAS REFERENCING, THAT THEY WOULD BE WILLING TO CARRY THAT FORWARD INTO ANY ADDITION TO THE MUD. HAVE YOU I DON'T KNOW IF YOU LOOK THROUGH 630 IS WHAT IT WAS ON THE LAST ONE IS 630 ON THIS ONE KIND OF THE SAME NUMBER YOU WOULD THINK, OR IS IT, YOU KNOW, TIME HAS PASSED. IT WAS 20. IT DIDN'T SEEM LIKE IT WAS 21, 21 WHENEVER WE LOOKED AT THIS ORIGINALLY, BUT WE HAVE NOT INCORPORATED THAT INTO, I THINK, AN AGREEMENT IN A WHILE. SO WE'D HAVE TO LOOK AT THAT AND SEE IF THAT'S THE RIGHT AMOUNT OR NOT. OKAY. PROBABLY NEEDS TO BE A LITTLE BIT HIGHER. I WOULD ASSUME SO AS WELL. I THINK THAT WAS THE MAIN THINGS. I JUST WANTED TO VERIFY HOW WE WERE DOING THIS FROM AN EXISTING AGREEMENT AND A MODIFICATION OR AMENDMENT TO IT. AND WHAT WAS CHANGING IN THE EXISTING VERSUS.SO THANK YOU. THE ONLY OTHER THING I'LL CONFIRM TO COUNCILMEMBER STEWART'S QUESTION ON THE COMMERCIAL IN THESE AGREEMENTS, IN THESE AGREEMENTS, IF THERE'S ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS YOU WANT TO PUT ONTO THE COMMERCIAL, WE CAN DO THAT AND HAVE DONE THAT ON MOST OF OUR MOST OF OUR AGREEMENTS. EVEN IF IT'S, YOU KNOW, GENERALLY. C-3, THERE ARE THINGS THAT WE CAN THAT WE'VE RESTRICTED THROUGH THESE CONSENT AGREEMENTS. REAL QUICK, AMY, CAN I ASK YOU A COUPLE QUESTIONS BEFORE WE GET FEEDBACK? ALL RIGHT. I'M GONNA ASK YOU SOME FAIRLY BLUNT QUESTIONS. AND SO IF Y'ALL DON'T GET THIS APPROVAL, DO Y'ALL, DO Y'ALL DO THIS PROJECT? IF Y'ALL DON'T GET THE AGE RESTRICTED THAT YOU'RE ASKING FOR. THANK YOU FOR THAT QUESTION. NO, WE DON'T. JUST BECAUSE THE MARKET HERE, WE WOULDN'T DO THIS AS A TRADITIONAL SINGLE FAMILY PRODUCT. SO WE WOULD NOT MOVE FORWARD WITH THAT IF IT'S NOT A SUN CITY PRODUCT. OKAY. SO IF IF IT DID NOT GET INTEGRATED INTO WOODSIDE, I'M ASKING YOU TO PUT ON YOUR HAT AS A AS AN EVIL DEVELOPER. AND THIS GETS DEVELOPED AS AN ETJ OR, YOU KNOW, OUT OF CITY MUD. YOU KNOW, WHAT TYPE OF PRODUCT, HOW MUCH DENSITY DO YOU THINK YOU CAN GET ON THIS? YEAH, I MEAN, THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION. IF IF WE, YOU KNOW, DIDN'T DEVELOP THIS LAND IN COOPERATION WITH THE CITY, IT WOULD IT WOULD LOOK VERY DIFFERENT, RIGHT? YOU WOULDN'T HAVE, YOU'D PROBABLY HAVE A LOT HIGHER DENSITY. YOU WOULDN'T HAVE THE AMENITIES THAT YOU HAVE HERE. YOU WOULDN'T HAVE PROBABLY THE
[01:05:03]
MASONRY WALLS. YOU WOULDN'T HAVE TO DO ALL OF THE REGIONAL IMPROVEMENTS. YOU KNOW, WHEN WE FOR MANY, MANY YEARS, THE WORD ROUGH PROPORTIONALITY WAS THROWN AROUND. AND SO WE USED TO DO TIA'S WHERE, YOU KNOW, IF WE'RE CONSTRUCTING A SIGNAL, YOU'RE DOING ONE LEG OF THE FOUR LEGS OF THE SIGNAL BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE REQUIRED TO DO. YOU TAKE YOUR 500 LOTS AND YOU RUN YOUR MODEL ON WHAT YOU'RE GOING TO NEED FOR WATER AND WASTEWATER. AND WE USED TO DO THAT, YOU KNOW, IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS WITH ROUGH PROPORTIONALITY. BUT NOW WE JUST WE DON'T TYPICALLY DO THAT ANYMORE. WE JUST BUILD THE WHOLE THING AND WE PARTNER WITH THE CITY OR THE JURISDICTION WE ARE IN TO DO THE REGIONAL IMPROVEMENT. SO BUT IF THIS WAS NOT SOMETHING THAT WE'D BE PARTNERING WITH THE CITY, WE WOULDN'T BE DOING ANY OF THOSE IMPROVEMENTS. OKAY. AND YOU'D BE AT A $1.25 MUD RATE. YEAH. THAT'S THE MAX MUD RATE THAT YOU CAN DO. WE'VE, YOU KNOW, OBVIOUSLY WE'RE FOLLOWING YOUR MUD POLICY ON THIS. WE'RE MATCHING IT $0.55 BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT THE SISTER DEVELOPMENT OF OF OF WOODSIDE IS KEVIN TO, TO KIND OF ANSWER YOUR QUESTION TOO, AGAIN, WE HAVEN'T SPOKEN WITH STAFF ON A LOT OF DETAILS. WE COULD POTENTIALLY DO THIS AS WOODSIDE MUD NUMBER TWO AND KIND OF RESET IT WITH THE TEN YEARS BECAUSE WE KNOW THAT THAT TEN YEAR BONDING. PIECE OF YOUR POLICY IS IMPORTANT. SO OBVIOUSLY THIS THIS THOMPSON PIECE WOULD HAVE TO HAVE ITS NEW OWN RUN UNRELATED TO WOODSIDE. BUT THERE ARE A COUPLE OF DIFFERENT WAYS TO TACKLE THAT. RIGHT. ANYBODY ELSE HAS ANY QUESTIONS? WE NEED TO GIVE SOLID FEEDBACK AS WE CAN HEAR SO THEY KNOW HOW TO MOVE FORWARD. JAKE, I'LL START WITH YOU. YEAH. SO I MEAN, MY FEEDBACK IS I THINK THEY'VE MADE SOME TREMENDOUS IMPROVEMENTS FROM THE TIME THAT THEY CAME HERE THE FIRST TIME, INCLUDING THE EXPANSION OF THE COMMERCIAL ON 195, THE EXPANSION OF THE AMENITY CENTER. I THOUGHT THAT SLIDE 12 WAS REALLY INTERESTING INFORMATION AND KIND OF ASSUAGES SOME OF MY CONCERNS AROUND THE FINANCIAL COMPONENT TO IT, BUT IT'S NOT JUST THE FINANCIAL COMPONENT TO THE AGE RESTRICTED THAT I'M CONCERNED WITH. I MEAN, WE ALSO HAVE STATED THAT WE HAVE DEVELOPMENTAL VALUES OF ACCESSIBLE HOMES AND DIVERSITY OF HOUSING TYPES. AND I DON'T SEE THIS THIS MUD IS DOING THE OPPOSITE OF THAT. IN MY JUDGMENT. IT'S AN EXPANSION OF SUN CITY, WHICH IS MORE OF THE SAME HOUSING TYPE AND A HIGHER AGE RESTRICTED AGE RESTRICTIONS THAN WE, YOU KNOW, TYPICALLY ALLOW IN OUR MUD POLICY. SO I THINK FOR THOSE REASONS, YOU KNOW, DESPITE THE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE MUD, I IF IF, YOU KNOW, I AM NOT A FAN OF EXPANDING THE WOODSIDE MUD, THAT'S, THAT'S MY FEEDBACK. YEAH. THANKS FOR THE PRESENTATION. YOU KNOW, I CONCUR WITH JAKE ON WHAT HE STATED IN THE BEGINNING, WHICH IS I THINK SLIDE 12 IS VERY HELPFUL. AND I WOULD I WOULD DEFINITELY ENCOURAGE OTHERS THAT ARE LOOKING AT, AT AGE RESTRICTED TYPE COMMUNITIES TO INCORPORATE THIS TYPE DATA. SO I REALLY APPRECIATE YOU ALL THINKING THROUGH THAT. AS FAR AS, YOU KNOW, THE, THE DATA ON, YOU KNOW, THE TAX REVENUE, EVEN THE TURNING OF HOMES IN SUN CITY, WHEREAS THAT, YOU KNOW, MAKES SENSE, YOU KNOW, WASN'T REALLY SOMETHING THAT I WAS THINKING ABOUT IN, IN THE PREVIOUS PRESENTATION. SO I APPRECIATE YOU INCORPORATING ALL OF THAT. FOR ME. I THINK IT'S WORTH LOOKING AT BOTH THE PROS AND THE CONS. I STILL HAVE THE SAME CONCERNS WITH PUBLIC SAFETY. I STILL HAVE THE SAME CONCERNS WITH OVERALL AGE RESTRICTED COMMUNITIES IN OUR COMMUNITY, BECAUSE I DO THINK THAT WE NEED TO WE NEED TO BE SURE THAT WE HAVE A DIVERSE HOUSING PRODUCT. HOWEVER, I THINK WITH THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY AND ITS CONTIGUOUS NATURE TO OUR EXISTING SUN CITY, WHICH IS A VALUABLE ASSET IN OUR COMMUNITY, I DO SUPPORT MOVING FORWARD WITH THIS PROJECT. I DO LIKE THE IDEA OF NICK, OF ADDING WHATEVER THE TAX IS. I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S THE RIGHT WORD, BUT TO SUPPORT OUR PUBLIC SAFETY, I THINK THAT IS A BIG CONCERN THAT I HAVE IS THAT, YOU KNOW, WE DO HAVE A POPULATION NOT ONLY AT SUN CITY, BUT WE HAVE AN OLDER POPULATION IN OUR COMMUNITY AS A WHOLE. AND I THINK ANYTHING THAT WE CAN DO TO CONTINUE TO SUPPORT THAT. SO I THINK THAT'S A GREAT ADDITION THERE. HOWEVER, WE NEED TO LOOK AT THAT NUMBER. I DO WANT TO BE SURE THAT TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES THAT WE ARE, YOU KNOW, ACCOUNTING FOR EVERYTHING THAT NEEDS TO BE PAID FOR THERE. AND I DO THINK THAT, YOU KNOW, THIS MAKES SENSE FOR ANOTHER ADDITION OF AN AGE RESTRICTED COMMUNITY, BUT I WOULD STILL HESITATE FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS THAT AREN'T CONTIGUOUS TO SUN CITY THAT THAT WE WOULD ALLOW, YOU KNOW, AGE RESTRICTED OUTSIDE OF THE MUD POLICY. BUT I THINK THIS ONE IS AN EXCEPTION THAT MAKES SENSE FOR THE CITY FROM A TAX REVENUE STANDPOINT, AND FOR OUR[01:10:01]
SUN CITY RESIDENTS TO CONTINUE TO HAVE EXPANDED AMENITIES IN THIS PROJECT. AND SO FOR THAT REASON, I WOULD BE SUPPORTIVE MOVING FORWARD. IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE YOU NEEDED? DID I COVER YOUR YOUR QUESTIONS? I ALSO JUST, YOU KNOW, OBVIOUSLY, I THINK FOR ANNEXING INTO THE CITY, I THINK THAT THAT'S IMPORTANT AS WELL. I THINK THAT WE WILL GET A HIGHER QUALITY DEVELOPMENT IN THIS PROJECT THAN WE WILL GET, IF OTHERWISE, NOT ALLOWING THIS TO DEVELOP.THANKS. THANK YOU. BEN, I DON'T WANT TO CUT YOU SHORT, BUT I THINK WE CAN PUT YOU DOWN FOR A NO. BUT WE WE NEED TO KIND OF MOVE. BUT UNLESS YOU GOT ANYTHING ELSE TO ADD. YEAH. I THINK WE PUT BEN DOWN FOR A NO. GO AHEAD KEVIN. I'M OVERALL SUPPORTIVE OF GOING AHEAD AND MOVING FORWARD. A COUPLE OF THINGS. I THINK WE NEED TO INCORPORATE INSURERS. THE INCREASED ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS LIKE THE FIRST LIKE THE CURRENT WOODSIDE HAS THE FIRE CIP FEE. NEED TO LOOK AT THAT AND UPDATE THE NUMBER TO MAKE SURE IT'S MATCHING TODAY'S TODAY'S NEED AND DOLLAR AMOUNT, I THINK INCREASING. I APPRECIATE THE ADDITION OF COMMERCIAL. NOW I'M GOING TO CRITICIZE THE COMMERCIAL. NOT REALLY CRITICIZED, BUT I WOULD SAY PROBABLY DOUBLE THE SETBACK. IF IT'S C THREE DOUBLE THE SETBACK REQUIREMENT ON THE C THREE WITHIN THE C THREE. ZONING UP TO THE RESIDENTIAL I DON'T KNOW THE BUILDING ENVELOPE IS. AND IF THAT WOULD MAKE IT DIFFICULT. SO MAYBE THAT DOUBLING IT'S NOT THE RIGHT AMOUNT. BUT NICK IF YOU COULD WORK ON THAT AND NEGOTIATE THAT LOOKING JUST TO INCREASE THE C THREE UP AGAINST THE RESIDENTIAL A LITTLE BIT OR THE SETBACK, THE ANYTHING ELSE ON THE TRANSPORTATION SIDE THAT CAN BE ADDRESSED WITH THE IMPACT FEES. I THINK THIS SECTION NEEDS TO PAY THE IMPACT FEES, ESPECIALLY NOW THAT THEY'RE IN PLACE AND WHATEVER THOSE ARE SHOULD BE PAYING THAT. IF THERE'S SOMETHING ELSE YOU CAN NEGOTIATE IN THE WAY OF, I DON'T MIND IF WE WAIVE THOSE. IF IF THERE'S OTHER COSTS THAT ARE OFFSITE THAT NEED TO BE DONE THAT THEY'RE GOING TO PAY, THAT WOULD OF COURSE, THOSE WOULD BE CREDITS TO IT ANYWAY.
FOR EXAMPLE, GETTING BOTH TRAFFIC LIGHTS, IF THAT IS AN OFFSET OR WHATEVER THAT MAY BE, BUT GIVE YOU SOME FREEDOM TO NEGOTIATE ON THAT FRONT. I THINK THAT'S THE MAIN THE MAIN THINGS I HAVE. THANK YOU. THE, THE TWO MAIN THINGS THAT I WAS CONCERNED ABOUT LAST TIME WAS OBVIOUSLY THE COMMERCIAL AT THE FRONT, WHICH I THINK HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. AND THEN THE AGE RESTRICTION AS FAR AS THE FINANCIAL IMPACT ON THE CITY, I FEEL BETTER ABOUT THAT. I THINK AMANDA SUMMARIZED MY FEELINGS PRETTY WELL ON THAT. I'M GENERALLY AGAINST MORE AGE RESTRICTION IN THE CITY, HOWEVER, BECAUSE THIS IS ATTACHED TO SUN CITY, I THINK IN THIS PARTICULAR INSTANCE IT MAKES SENSE. SO I'M GENERALLY IN FAVOR OF IT. MY ONLY FEEDBACK, AND IT'S ALREADY BEEN MENTIONED IS THE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES, MAKING SURE THAT WE'RE COVERED THERE. I DON'T KNOW THAT WE ARE, BUT IF YOU CAN JUST ASSURE US ON THAT ONE, IF YOU WANT TO OPEN UP THE OLD AGREEMENT AND PUT THOSE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES IN THE WHOLE SITE, YOU KNOW, WE CAN WE CAN LOOK AT THAT TOO. JUST OFFER THAT UP. I MEAN, IT'D BE A GREAT DEAL FOR YOU ALL. IT'S INTERESTING AS AS A RESIDENT OF SUN CITY, I'M KIND OF EXCITED ABOUT THE FACT THAT SUN CITY HAS THE CHANCE TO ACTUALLY EXPAND A LITTLE BIT MORE, BECAUSE I'VE ENJOYED A QUALITY OF LIFE THERE, AND I'VE SEEN WHAT THEY'VE DONE WITH THEIR AMENITY CENTERS. I PARTICULARLY LIKE THE FACT THAT THE COMMERCIAL HAS BEEN ADDED. I'M PLEASED WITH THE FACT THAT THERE'S THE TWO SIGNALS, NOT JUST ONE. SO OVERALL, I WOULD BE IN FAVOR OF MOVING FORWARD WITH NEGOTIATING THE MUD EXPANSION, KNOWING THAT THERE ARE PEOPLE THAT DON'T WANT TO SEE ANY MORE EXPANSION. THAT'S ALSO TRUE. I EARLIER STATED AT THE LAST MEETING THAT HAVING AN AGE RESTRICTION COMMUNITY DOES NOT BOTHER ME. I THINK IT'S FINE BECAUSE I'VE BEEN LIVING THERE. THANK YOU. YEAH, I'M GENERALLY SUPPORTIVE OF THIS. I APPRECIATE THE COMMERCIAL PUSH OFF OF OUR SEGREGATING 195 FROM RESIDENTS. THANK YOU FOR THE FINANCIAL SIDE. THAT'S SUPER HELPFUL AND ALL OF THIS. I AM BLOWN AWAY THAT PEOPLE ARE PAYING A $250,000 PREMIUM FOR A SUN CITY PRODUCT. BUT I GUESS AS I DRIVE THROUGH SUN CITY, I CAN SEE WHY IT'S A GREAT NEIGHBORHOOD. THE INVOLVEMENT PEOPLE ARE OUT THERE. I LOVE TO SEE THAT. SO I GENERALLY SUPPORTIVE OF THIS AS LONG AS AGAIN, I THINK COUNCIL MEMBER PITTS WAS MENTIONING C THREE IN THE ZONING AREA. THE ONE THING I DON'T WANT TO SEE IS ANYTHING WITH C THREE CARRIES. WHAT A 65 FOOT HEIGHT RESTRICTION ON IT. SO I DEFINITELY WOULD NOT WANT THAT ABUTTED TO THE RESIDENTS THAT LIVE THERE. SO I'D BE REALLY CAUTIOUS IN HOW WE COME OR HOW WE LOOK AT THAT COMMERCIAL TRACK THAT YOU'VE GOT AGAINST 195. BUT THAT'S MY ONLY FEEDBACK. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. I THINK WE'VE GOT CLEAR DIRECTION MOVING FORWARD HERE. I DO YOU KNOW, I'D REITERATE WHAT EVERYONE SAID. I THINK THIS IS, YOU KNOW, WE GOT TO LOOK AT EACH PROPERTY AS AS IT IS AND WHERE IT IS. AND I THINK THAT BEING CONTIGUOUS TO SUN CITY, YOU KNOW, IS KIND OF WHAT WE WHAT YOU'VE HEARD IS THE JUSTIFICATION FOR THE DEVIATION FROM THE MUD POLICY, WHICH HOPEFULLY OTHERS WON'T TAKE AS CARTE BLANCHE TO GO, YOU KNOW, UP THAT RATIO THROUGHOUT THE
[01:15:05]
ENTIRE CITY. I THINK THIS IS A UNIQUE PROPERTY. BUT YOU KNOW, THE OTHER THING TOO, THAT MY LINE OF QUESTIONING LED TO IS I DON'T THINK ANYONE WOULD LIKE WHAT THIS PROPERTY COULD LOOK LIKE IF THIS PROJECT DOESN'T HAPPEN. AND I THINK THE FOLKS IN SUN CITY, THE FOLKS IN WOODSIDE, DO NOT WANT TO SEE THE ALTERNATE ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROPERTY.AND SO, YOU KNOW, I'M IN SUPPORT OF AS WELL MOVING FORWARD. AND WITH EVERYTHING, THE CONDITIONS, EVERYTHING THAT EVERYONE HAS STATED HERE. SO THANK YOU NICK. THANK YOU TEAM AND WE'LL SEE YOU GUYS AGAIN SOON. HEY, LET'S TAKE FIVE MINU
[1.C Heirloom PID Development Agreement]
ALL RIGHT, WE'RE BACK. WE'RE MOVING FROM MUDS TO PEDS. GOOD. NICK. AND I THINK WAYNE NERO SAID HE WOULD COME UP AND DO THE NEXT MUD ITEM FOR THAT WE HAVE. SO. OKAY, SO THIS ITEM IS FOR THE HEIRLOOM PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, WHICH IS AN EXISTING DISTRICT THAT THE CITY HAS. AND THIS IS THERE'S, THERE'S TWO REQUESTS HERE TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.SO THE PURPOSE IS TO SEEK COUNCIL'S FEEDBACK AND DIRECTION ON A REQUEST TO AMEND THE HEIRLOOM PIG, WHICH IS A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT. THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT TO GRANT ADDITIONAL VARIANCES TO THE PYD POLICY AND ALLOW WATER, WATER QUALITY PONDS TO BE OWNED BY THE CITY. SO THE FEEDBACK REQUESTED FROM COUNCIL IS ONE. DOES COUNCIL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE REQUESTS THAT WERE NOT ADDRESSED DURING THE PRESENTATION? TWO DOES COUNCIL SUPPORT EXPANDING THE VARIANCE TO ALLOW ALL OR SOME OF THE COSTS REQUESTED TO BE ADDED TO THE PYD CONSTRUCTION BOND? AND THIRD, DOES COUNCIL SUPPORT CITY STAFF EXPLORING OPTIONS TO ALLOW THE WATER QUALITY PONDS TO BE OWNED BY THE CITY, BUT MAINTAINED BY THE HOA? AND I'M GOING TO MAKE THE FULL PRESENTATION. THE DEVELOPMENT TEAM IS HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS OR ADD ANY ADDITIONAL CONTEXT THAT'S THAT'S NEEDED. SO A LITTLE BIT OF BACKGROUND.
THIS PROPERTY WAS ANNEXED, ZONED AND HAD A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT APPROVED IN AUGUST OF 2025. THE PUD COVERS MOST OF THE LAND USE STANDARDS, AND THE PYD DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT COVERS SOME ADDITIONAL LAND DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS, WHICH INCLUDES THE OWNERSHIP OF THE WATER QUALITY PONDS AND THE PYD REQUIREMENTS. THE PROPERTY IS 620 ACRES AND WILL INCLUDE INCLUDE UP TO 3600 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, VARYING IN SIZES AND TYPES OF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT, AND A LARGE SITE OWNED BY GSD. THE PYD DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SPECIFIED AN APPROVED VARIANCE, WHICH ALLOWS THE DEVELOPER TO ISSUE CONSTRUCTION BONDS FOR THE COST OF THE PRIMARY COLLECTOR ROAD AND LOWER THE REQUIREMENT FOR THIS BOND ISSUANCE FROM A 4 TO 1 VALUE TO LIEN RATIO TO A 2 TO 1 VALUE LIEN RATIO. IF THEY BUILD THE ENTIRETY OF THE COLLECTOR ROAD IN THEIR INITIAL PHASE. SO JUST TO ORIENT YOU A LITTLE BIT TO THE DEVELOPMENT ON THE FAR RIGHT, BOTTOM RIGHT CORNER IS THE INTERSECTION OF RONALD REAGAN AND WILLIAMS DRIVE.
YOU'VE GOT COUNTY ROAD 248 THAT CUTS RIGHT THROUGH THE MIDDLE OF THE SITE. I SAY COUNTY ROAD, BUT IT'S IN THE CITY LIMITS NOW, SO IT'S NOW A CITY ROAD. THERE ARE TWO FUTURE ROADS THAT ARE SHOWN. ONE IS GOT THE YELLOW, BLUE AND RED, WHICH IS THE FUTURE PRIMARY COLLECTOR ROAD THAT CONNECTS FROM PALMER RANCH BOULEVARD ALONG 2338. AND THEN IT ULTIMATELY TIES INTO RONALD REAGAN ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE SITE. MOST OF THE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT IS HERE ALONG RONALD REAGAN. YOU'VE GOT THE RESIDENTIAL IN THE KIND OF ORANGE AND TAN, AND THEN YOU'VE GOT SOME MULTIFAMILY AS WELL. AND THEN THE GISD SITE IS IN BLUE. AND THEN THEY ALSO HAVE THIS KIND OF TEAL BLUE COLOR, WHICH IS NOT AN EXISTING ROAD. THAT'S A FUTURE PRIMARY ARTERIAL ROAD THAT WOULD BE CONSTRUCTED BY THE BY THE DEVELOPER. SO THE ROAD IN QUESTION, THOUGH, THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT IS THIS COLLECTOR ROAD THAT'S IN YELLOW, BLUE AND RED. SO THE CITY'S NORMAL PYD POLICY REQUIRES THAT EVERYTHING YOU SEE ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THE SCREEN THERE, PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS, THE CITY MUST HAVE CONFIRMED THE PIT IMPROVEMENTS TO BE REIMBURSED HAVE BEEN COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS, AND THE CITY HAS ACCEPTED THOSE IMPROVEMENTS WITH THE HEIRLOOM PYD. THE CHANGE THERE WAS THAT THE ISSUANCE OF PYD BONDS WOULD BE ALLOWED PRIOR TO THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE, AND THIS IS JUST THE LANGUAGE THAT WAS INCLUDED IN THE IN THIS HEIRLOOM PIT AGREEMENT, WHICH BASICALLY SAYS IF THEY AGREE TO CONSTRUCT THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THAT PRIMARY COLLECTOR, THE AGREEMENT SAYS THEY CAN BUILD
[01:20:04]
IT IN THREE PHASES. BUT IF THEY AGREE TO BUILD IT THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE COLLECTOR ALL UP FRONT IN THEIR FIRST PHASE, THEN TWO THING COUNCIL WOULD VARY ON TWO PARTS OF THE PYD POLICY. FIRST IS THEY COULD GO DOWN FROM A 4 TO 1 VALUE TO LEAN RATIO TO A 2 TO 1 VALUE TO LEAN RATIO. AND SECOND IS THAT THEY COULD GET THOSE PYD BOND PROCEEDS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION VERSUS OUR NORMAL POLICY, WHICH WHICH WOULD MAKE THEM WAIT TILL AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. SO COUNCIL HAS ALREADY APPROVED BOTH OF THOSE THINGS. AND JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, THE CHANGE IN THE VALUE TO DEBT RATIO IS THAT ONLY FOR THE ISSUANCE RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE ROAD, OR DOES THAT GIVE THEM THE 2 TO 1 FOR THE ENTIRE PROJECT, JUST FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, JUST THE DOLLARS ON THE ROAD LOAN TO VALUE EVERY EVERY OTHER ISSUANCE THEY HAVE WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE AT 4 TO 1. GOT IT. THANKS. YEAH. SO THE THE REQUEST FROM THE DEVELOPER RELATED TO THIS PIT CONSTRUCTION BOND. SO THEY'VE REQUESTED TO INCLUDE ALL OF THEIR WHAT'S CALLED MAJOR IMPROVEMENT AREA COSTS INTO THAT CONSTRUCTION BOND, WHICH THEY ARE CURRENTLY PREPARING TO ISSUE THAT THAT BOND. SO THE HIDS WILL TYPICALLY HAVE A WHAT'S CALLED A MASTER IMPROVEMENT AREA. AND THESE ARE IMPROVEMENTS WHICH WHICH SERVE THE ENTIRETY OF THE DEVELOPMENT. AND THEN THEY'LL HAVE SPECIFIC IMPROVEMENT AREAS WHICH ARE IMPROVEMENTS SERVING SPECIFIC AREAS OF THE DEVELOPMENT. SO YOU YOU SAW THIS RECENTLY WITH THE BLUFFVIEW PYD. THERE WERE BASICALLY MAJOR IMPROVEMENTS THAT WERE DONE. AND SO EVERYONE IN THE DEVELOPMENT WILL PAY THAT. AND THEN THERE'S SPECIFIC AREA BONDS THAT ARE JUST PAID BY THAT PART OF THE THE DEVELOPMENT. IT'S SOMETHING UNIQUE TO HIDS VERSUS THE MUD AGREEMENTS THAT WE HAVE. SO IN ADDITION TO THE COLLECTOR ROAD, WHICH IS ALREADY ALLOWED TO BE PAID FOR WITH THE THE CONSTRUCTION BONDS AND HAVE THE 2 TO 1, THE THE ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS THAT THEY'RE REQUESTING WOULD INCLUDE WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITIES, TWO WATER QUALITY PONDS, AND THEN PARK IMPROVEMENTS, WHICH IS PRIMARILY THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TRAIL THROUGHOUT THEIR MAJOR PARK THAT THEY HAVE, WHICH WOULD BE A CITY OWNED PARK THAT WILL BE OPEN TO TO ALL RESIDENTS OF GEORGETOWN, NOT JUST NOT JUST THEIR RESIDENTS. SO ALL OF THE MAJOR IMPROVEMENT AREA IMPROVEMENTS WILL COST AN ESTIMATED $16.5 MILLION, AND THAT WOULD BRING THE VALUE TO LEAN RATIO IN AT ROUGHLY 2.84 TO 1. AND AGAIN, THEY'RE THEY'RE REQUIRED TO BE AT A MINIMUM OF 2 TO 1. SO THEY DO STILL MEET THAT REQUIREMENT IF THEY FOLLOWED WHAT'S IN THE CURRENT AGREEMENT AND ONLY HAD THE COLLECTOR ROAD, THAT WOULD COST AN ESTIMATED $11.6 MILLION. THAT WOULD BRING THE VALUE TO LEAN RATIO IN AT ROUGHLY 4.04 TO 1. IF WE DID ALL OF THE IMPROVEMENTS EXCEPT FOR THE WATER QUALITY PONDS. AND THAT'S OUR NEXT DISCUSSION ITEM, BECAUSE BASICALLY THE REASON THAT'S IMPORTANT IS THE WATER QUALITY PONDS RIGHT NOW ARE REQUIRED TO BE OWNED BY THE HOA.SO SINCE THAT'S A PRIVATE OWNERSHIP, IT'S NOT ELIGIBLE FOR ANY PYD REIMBURSEMENTS. IT HAS TO BE A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. SO IF ALL THE IMPROVEMENTS EXCEPT THE WATER QUALITY PONDS CAME IN, THAT WOULD BE A COST OF ROUGHLY 15.3 MILLION. THAT WOULD BRING THE VALUE TO LEAN RATIO IN TO ROUGHLY 3.09 TO 1. HEY NICK, ARE THESE ARE THOSE THE PONDS THAT ARE THAT ARE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AS A WHOLE OR FOR THE OR FOR THE RUNOFF FROM THE ROADS. SO TYPICALLY, WHAT WE'LL SEE IN A SITUATION LIKE THIS WHERE THEY'RE BUILDING THE ROAD ITSELF, THE PUBLIC ROAD ITSELF AND EVERYTHING FOR THE, THE DEVELOPMENT THEY'RE SERVING BOTH. SO, YOU KNOW, IN THEORY, THEY COULD GO IN AND LOOK AT WHAT PORTION OF THOSE PONDS ARE FOR THE ROAD AND WHAT ARE FOR THE, THE, YOU KNOW, THE NEIGHBORHOOD ITSELF. I THINK IN THEORY, THE ENGINEERS COULD RUN THAT. BUT THESE PONDS SERVE WILL SERVE BOTH PURPOSES. ANY ANY QUESTIONS ON THE CONSTRUCTION BOND BEFORE I MOVE INTO THE THE PONDS. I KNOW THIS IS A LITTLE BIT ON THE MASTER IMPROVEMENT AREA WITH THE WATER WASTEWATER, THE UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS. IT'S ONLY IN AND AROUND THAT AREA. IT'S NOT FOR THE WHOLE SITE. I MEAN, CAN YOU CAN YOU SHOW THAT AREA AGAIN, I, I'M NOT SHOWING THE WATER QUALITY PONDS ON THIS SLIDE, BUT SO FOR EXAMPLE, THE WHEN THEY BUILD THIS ROAD, THIS PRIMARY COLLECTOR ROAD, THERE WILL BE WATER LINE, THERE WILL
[01:25:02]
BE A WATER LINE THAT'S RUNNING WITHIN THAT RIGHT OF WAY. SO THERE'S, THERE'S SOME LOGIC TO INCLUDING THAT COST INTO THEIR. THERE WILL BE SOME WASTEWATER. THE PRIMARY WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENTS ARE WITHIN THIS. BASICALLY WITHIN THIS FLOODPLAIN PARKLAND HERE THAT ENDS UP CONNECTING OVER TO KIND OF THIS IS THE NOLINA DEVELOPMENT TO THE WEST. AND THEN WE HAVE A LIFT STATION, CITY WASTEWATER LIFT STATION KIND OF DOWN IN THIS AREA. SO THOSE ARE REALLY OFF SITE TO THE ROAD. BUT THOSE ARE KIND OF WHAT THE WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS ARE. AND THEN JUST SO ARE THEY ASKING FOR REIMBURSEMENT FOR THOSE WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENTS OR JUST THE ONES FOR ALL IN THE ROAD? YEAH. ALL WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENTS. AND THEN THERE'S, LIKE I SAID, THIS SLIDE DOESN'T SHOW WHERE THE TWO STORMWATER PONDS ARE LOCATED. LOGAN MAY BE ABLE TO. I'VE GOT A GOOD HE'S GOT A MAP THAT CAN SHOW THAT IF YOU WANT TO SEE IT. BUT. SO NICK IS THERE. YOU'RE SAYING IT MAKES SENSE. OBVIOUSLY, THEY'RE BUILDING THE ROADS IN THE RIGHT OF WAYS, WHERE SOME OF THE UTILITY IS GOING TO BE DOING THAT WORK AT THE SAME TIME. MAKES SOME SENSE. DOING WORK OFFSITE OF THAT DOES IS THERE SOME LOGICAL REASON WHY THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE? I MEAN, THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT AND THE SPIRIT OF THAT AGREEMENT WAS THE ROAD. OBVIOUSLY, THERE'S SOME OTHER THINGS THAT GO ALONG IN THAT WITH THAT. BUT OUTSIDE OF THE ROAD, IS THERE IS THERE SOME REASON THAT IT MAKES SENSE TO DO THOSE AS WELL FROM AN EFFICIENCY STANDPOINT, OR IS IT BETTER FOR FOR THE CITY AS WELL, IF THEY WERE TO DO THOSE? YOU UNDERSTAND MY QUESTION. YEAH, I UNDERSTAND YOUR QUESTION. I THINK THOSE THOSE IMPROVEMENTS WILL WILL HAPPEN AT SOME POINT OR ANOTHER. SO, YOU KNOW, I THINK SPEAKING FOR FOR THEM AND LOGAN ABLE TO COME UP, COME UP AND ANSWER IT A LITTLE BIT BETTER DOING THOSE IMPROVEMENTS RIGHT NOW FROM A CONSTRUCTION STANDPOINT MAKES SENSE. IT'S REALLY A QUESTION OF SHOULD THOSE BE ELIGIBLE IN THE UPFRONT CONSTRUCTION BOND. SO ALL OF THE IMPROVEMENTS OUTSIDE OF THE PONDS WOULD BE ELIGIBLE FOR PIT REIMBURSEMENTS AT SOME AT SOME POINT, NOT NECESSARILY UPFRONT OR AT THE TWO. WELL, THAT'S NOT THE QUESTION AT HAND ISN'T NECESSARILY WHETHER THEY'RE ELIGIBLE FOR FUNDING OR NOT. IT'S THE PRE FUNDING PIECE WHICH WE AGREED TO, WHICH IS OUTSIDE OF OUR POLICY DUE TO THE WE SEE VALUE IN THE ROAD BEING BUILT THERE. WE'D LIKE TO HAVE THE ROAD BUILT AND WE CAN TAKE THAT RISK, OBVIOUSLY NEEDING THE UTILITIES RUNNING ALONG WITH THAT AT THE SAME TIME. MAKES SENSE. IS THERE ANY VALUE TO THIS DEVELOPMENT? THEY GET IT ALL DONE, BUT THEN THE DEVELOPMENT DOESN'T GO FORWARD.AND WE HAVE A WASTEWATER LINE RUNNING THROUGH THE FLOODPLAIN AREA THERE. IS THERE ANY BENEFIT TO THE CITY TO HAVE THAT WASTEWATER LINE? DOES IT CREATE REDUNDANCY? DOES IT IMPROVE THE SYSTEM OVERALL, BROADLY? NO. I MEAN, IT SETS UP THIS AREA FOR SUCCESS. IT SETS UP THE WHOLE DEVELOPMENT AREA FOR SUCCESS. SO THERE'S YOU KNOW, THERE'S THERE'S DEFINITELY BENEFIT THERE. AND THEN THE THE PARKLAND IMPROVEMENTS ARE BASICALLY RIGHT IN LINE WITH THE WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENTS. SO THERE'S A LOT OF EFFICIENCY OF DOING THOSE, THOSE AT THE SAME TIME AS ARE THOSE NEAR THE ROAD. THE PARKLAND SHOW ME IS THE PARKLAND. PARKLAND IS EVERYTHING YOU SEE IN GREEN THERE. OKAY. THAT'S WHAT I THOUGHT. YEAH. SO IT'S NOT IT'S OFF SIDE OF THE ROAD. IT'S FOR THE WASTEWATER. OKAY. CORRECT.
OKAY. THANK YOU. HEY NICK, CAN I ASK IT IN A SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT WAY WHERE KEVIN'S GOING? SOMEWHAT. BUT. SO IF YOU WERE TO COME IN AND PULL A PERMIT TO BUILD THIS ROAD, COULD WE DIFFERENTIATE AND GO, HEY, THIS IS WHAT YOU KNOW, WE WOULD REQUIRE YOU TO BUILD IF YOU WERE BUILDING THIS ROAD IN TERMS OF THE UTILITIES AND THE PONDS VERSUS, YOU KNOW WHAT? THEY'RE OBVIOUSLY VOLUNTARILY, BUT WHAT THEY'RE WHAT THEY'RE GOING TO BUILD WHEN THEY BUILD THE ROAD VERSUS IF WE WERE BUILDING THIS ROAD, IF WE WERE BUILDING THIS, THIS PRIMARY COLLECTOR, WHAT ALL WOULD WE REQUIRE OURSELVES TO PUT IN IN TERMS OF UTILITIES AND PONDS AT THE TIME WE WERE BUILDING THAT ROAD? IS THERE A WAY TO LIKE, TAKE A SNAPSHOT AND FIGURE THAT PART OUT? DOES THAT MAKE SENSE? YEAH, I MEAN, SO I'LL JUST I'LL GIVE A SIMILAR BUT BUT DIFFERENT EXAMPLE, JUST BECAUSE WE HAD TO RUN SOME CALCULATIONS. SO WITH THE, WITH THE SOUTHWESTERN 560 PROJECT, WE HAVE THE G TECH AGREEMENT, WHICH SPECIFICALLY CALLS OUT ONLY REIMBURSEMENT FOR ROADS. SO THE ENGINEER IN THAT CASE WENT THROUGH AND LOOKED AT, OKAY, THERE'S OTHER DEVELOPMENT COSTS, INCLUDING UTILITIES. SOME OF THE UTILITIES ARE EVEN IN THE RIGHT OF WAY, BUT THEY WERE ABLE TO PULL OUT AND SHOW JUST WHAT THE COSTS OF THE ROAD ARE. THEY WERE ALSO ABLE TO PULL OUT IN THAT CASE. THERE'S ALSO, YOU KNOW, ONE MAJOR STORMWATER POND. SO THEY WERE ABLE TO PULL OUT WHAT'S THE PROPORTIONAL SHARE OF THE STORMWATER POND COST FOR THE ROAD VERSUS THE REST OF THE DEVELOPMENT. SO IN THEORY, WE COULD WE COULD DO THAT IN THIS CASE AS WELL. YEAH. AND I GET THAT. BUT I GUESS IN TERMS OF LIKE WHAT THE AGREEMENT CURRENTLY SAYS, YOU KNOW, WOULD WE LET THEM BUILD THE ROAD
[01:30:04]
WITHOUT THE OTHER, WITHOUT THE UTILITIES IN THE PONDS? DEPENDS ON HOW THEY REQUEST IT. I MEAN, THEY'RE SO THEY ARE, THEY HAVE IT AS A PART OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS THAT ARE TIED TO THE DEVELOPMENT ITSELF. SO TO, TO SERVE PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT, THEY HAVE TO HAVE A WATER LINE THAT COMES IN TO SERVE IT. AND SO YEAH, THE WATER LINE IS NEEDED TO SERVE THAT. THE WASTEWATER INFRASTRUCTURE IS NEEDED TO SERVE THOSE AREAS. SO THAT'S WHERE IT GETS A LITTLE BIT MIXED UP IN THAT YOU, YOU KNOW, ONCE YOU'VE ONCE THE ROAD IS SERVING PARTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT. YEAH, THERE ARE UTILITIES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO, TO SERVE THOSE. OKAY. GO AHEAD.SORRY, I DIDN'T MEAN TO. NICK. ONE OTHER QUESTION. I WASN'T HERE ON THE FIRST ROUND OF THIS.
IS THE CITY PURCHASING THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR ALL THIS FROM THE DEVELOPER? IS THAT SO THE YEAH, THAT'S THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION. SO THE THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE COLLECTOR ROAD AND THE ARTERIAL ROAD THAT YOU SHOW IS DEDICATED AND THEY'RE THEY'RE FUNDING THE FULL COST OF THOSE ROADS. NOW, THIS, THIS AGREEMENT WAS UNIQUE IN THAT THEY ARE SUBJECT TO IMPACT FEES.
BUT WHEN WE ADDED UP ALL THE COSTS OF THE MAJOR ROADS THAT ARE IMPACT FEE ELIGIBLE, THE IMPROVEMENTS GO WAY BEYOND WHAT THEY WOULD PAY AN IMPACT FEE. SO THE ONLY PART THAT THE CITY WILL HAVE TO PAY FOR A RIGHT OF WAY IS THE GREEN ALONG WILLIAMS DRIVE. THEY WILL DEDICATE THE RIGHT OF WAY, BUT THE CITY WILL HAVE TO ACTUALLY PAY FOR THAT RIGHT OF WAY. THAT ANSWERS YOUR YOUR QUESTION. OKAY, LET ME GO ON TO THE PONDS AND THEN WE CAN ANSWER ANY OTHER QUESTIONS YOU'VE GOT. SO IN REGARDS TO THE WATER QUALITY PONDS, THIS IS WITHIN THE THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, WHICH WHICH BASICALLY SAYS THAT THE OWNER SHALL NOT DEDICATE TO THE CITY, NOR WILL THE CITY ACCEPT OWNERSHIP OR RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PRIVATE DRAINAGE FACILITIES.
SO NOW IT DOES SAY OTHER THAN THE TRANSPORTATION RELATED DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS, WHAT'S UNIQUE IS YOU'D HAVE TO HAVE A DESIGNATED POND FOR THAT. THERE'S THERE'S NOT REALLY A WAY TO TO CALL THAT OUT. SO THE, THE PONDS ARE BASICALLY SET UP TO ALL BE PRIVATELY OWNED. SO THE DEVELOPER HAS REQUESTED FOR THE CITY TO OWN THE WATER QUALITY PONDS AND FOR THE HOA TO PERPETUALLY MAINTAIN THE PONDS. SO ALL CITY OF GEORGETOWN, MUD AND PICKETT AGREEMENTS REQUIRE IN ALL DEVELOPMENT IN GENERAL IN GEORGETOWN REQUIRES THE HOA TO OWN AND MAINTAIN THE WATER QUALITY PONDS ON THEIR SITE, AND THOSE ARE STRICTLY MONITORED BY TCWC. THAT'S PART OF THE REASON THAT WE DON'T WANT THE CITY, YOU KNOW, INVOLVED IN BASICALLY OWNING THOSE TYPES OF PONDS THAT ARE PRETTY MUCH STRICTLY FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT. SO IN A MUD DEVELOPMENT, THE MUD WILL TYPICALLY OWN AND MAINTAIN THOSE PONDS FOR A PERIOD OF TIME TO ALLOW THEM TO GET REIMBURSED FOR THE COST OF, OF THE POND THROUGH THEIR MUD BONDS. AND THEN THEY WILL TRANSFER IT TO THE HOA FOR OWNERSHIP AND MAINTENANCE AT A LATER DATE. IT'S A LITTLE BIT UNIQUE HERE WITH THE PYD, BECAUSE SINCE THE PONDS ARE OWNED BY THE HOA IN A PIT DEVELOPMENT AND ARE THEREFORE CONSIDERED PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS, THEY'RE NOT ELIGIBLE TO BE INCLUDED IN THE PIT BONDS. SO THAT'S KIND OF WHAT THIS ALL COMES DOWN TO. NOW THIS IS STANDARD. ALL OF OUR OTHER PYD AGREEMENTS, THE PONDS ARE ARE PRIVATELY MAINTAINED. AND SO THEY DON'T GET PYD REIMBURSEMENTS FOR THEM. SO THERE AND AGAIN, THERE ARE OTHER MULTIPLE PITS IN THE CITY.
NONE HAVE BEEN ALLOWED TO TRANSFER OWNERSHIP TO THE CITY. I WOULD SAY IF COUNCIL WOULD LIKE TO EXPLORE THIS, STAFF WOULD RECOMMEND ALLOWING SOME TIME TO LOOK AT HOW WE CAN LIMIT THE LONG TERM RISK TO THE CITY AND COME BACK WITH RECOMMENDATIONS, BUT NOT MAKE AN IMMEDIATE CHANGE IN THIS AGREEMENT, BECAUSE THERE ARE SOME RISKS. WE'VE HAD CHALLENGES WITH OTHER PONDS THAT DIDN'T GET TRANSFERRED OVER CORRECTLY IN THE PAST AND ARE NOW KIND OF SITTING IN LIMBO, WHICH BY DEFAULT KIND OF PUTS THE CITY, YOU KNOW, NOT NECESSARILY ON THE HOOK, BUT WE'RE WE'RE INVOLVED AT THAT POINT. SO THERE'S A LOT OF RISK INVOLVED HERE AND WHY THE CITY HAS TAKEN THIS STANCE IN THE PAST. SO EVEN IF YOU WANT US TO EXPLORE IT, I WOULD NOT RECOMMEND AN IMMEDIATE CHANGE TO THE AGREEMENT. CAN I ASK A QUESTION? SO HOW DOES IT WORK THOUGH IF IF WE OWN THE RIGHT OF WAY, THE RIGHT OF WAY IS DRAINING INTO THEIR POND AND. IF THAT POND IS IS NOT MAINTAINED OR WHATEVER, FOR WHATEVER REASON, DOES THAT, WHAT HAPPENS TO OUR RIGHT OF WAY AT THAT POINT? OR THE FLIP SIDE, LET'S SAY WE'RE NOT PROPERLY AND I KNOW WE'RE NOT GOING TO IF WE'RE NOT PROPERLY MAINTAINING THE RIGHT OF WAY AND WE'RE DRAINING INTO THEIR POND, DO THEY HAVE RECOURSE
[01:35:03]
BACK AGAINST US TO FIX OUR DRAINAGE ISSUE? THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION. I'M PROBABLY PROBABLY NOT FULLY PREPARED TO ANSWER THAT, BUT YEAH, BECAUSE IT SEEMS LIKE THE AGREEMENT CONTEMPLATES THAT THEY COULD BUILD TWO DIFFERENT SETS OF PONDS NOW. DOESN'T SEEM LIKE THAT WOULD MAKE MUCH ECONOMIC SENSE. AND THEY COULD TURN OVER THE ROAD RELATED PONDS TO US.YES. AND THEN WE'D BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OWNING AND MAINTAINING THOSE. BUT I MEAN, WE WOULD BE IN THAT CASE, WE WOULD NEVER WANT TO DO THAT THOUGH. RIGHT, RIGHT. BUT WE I MEAN, BUT WE DO THAT ON ROADS RIGHT NOW AND WE DO THAT ON DB WOODS. WE DO THAT ON OTHER ROADS THAT WE'RE BUILDING IS WE'RE WE'RE BUILDING. RIGHT. AND WE HAVE OWNERSHIP OF THAT.
IS THERE, IS THERE A WAY TO, TO PROPORTIONAL LIKE, LIKE DIVVY UP THE PROPORTION OF THE QUOTE UNQUOTE, PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS BECAUSE IT'S NOT REALLY A PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT. SOME OF THE WATER'S COMING OFF THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, AND SOME OF IT'S COMING OFF PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT. ALSO, YOU'RE NOT GOING TO MOBILIZE AN EARTHWORK GUY TWICE. HE'S GOING TO COME IN AND BUILD THE ROADS AND DIG THE PONDS IN ONE MOBILIZATION. IT'D BE STUPID TO DO IT ANY OTHER WAY. SO, I MEAN, THERE'S GOT TO BE WE. YEAH. WE'VE ASKED THE ATTORNEYS TO EXPLORE THAT QUESTION BECAUSE I THINK THAT WOULD IDEALLY WOULD HAVE BEEN THE MOST LOGICAL WAY TO HANDLE THIS. AND IF WE HAD FIGURED IT OUT, WE WOULDN'T EVEN BE HERE ASKING YOU A QUESTION. THEY THERE WAS NOT A WAY THEY COULD FIGURE OUT TO DIVVY UP THE OWNERSHIP NECESSARILY. SO THAT'S WHY IT'S REALLY MORE OF A THE CITY OWNS IT OR, OR, OR THEY OWN IT. IT'S. WELL, IT'S NOT EVEN IN MY MIND. IT'S NOT EVEN DIVVYING UP OWNERSHIP AS MUCH AS IT IS. JUST LIKE ASSIGNING A COST VALUE TO THAT. BUT MAYBE IT'S MORE COMPLICATED. I'M SURE IT'S MORE COMPLICATED LEGALLY THAN IT WAS MORE COMPLICATED FROM A, FROM A REIMBURSEMENT STANDPOINT. AND WHAT'S LEGALLY ALLOWED TO DO IN THAT CASE. OKAY. SO AND LOGAN IS HERE AVAILABLE TO COME UP AND ADD ANY ADDITIONAL CONTEXT OR ANSWER ANY ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT COUNCIL HAS. BUT AGAIN, WE'RE WE'RE SEEKING FEEDBACK FOR REALLY THE THREE QUESTIONS ON THE PAGE. DO YOU HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS? DO YOU SUPPORT EXPANDING THE VARIANCE? AND THEN DO YOU SUPPORT CITY STAFF EXPLORING OPTIONS ON THE WATER QUALITY PONDS? YEAH. AND THEN BEFORE WE DO FEEDBACK AND LOGAN, DO YOU WANT TO GO FOR A SECOND AND. WEIGH IN AND THEN WE'LL SEE IF ANYBODY HAS QUESTIONS FOR, FOR LOGAN AND OR NICK. I CAN PULL THAT ONE UP BECAUSE I CAN I THINK I CAN ANSWER A COUPLE OF YOUR QUESTIONS. I WAS JOTTING NOTES WHILE Y'ALL WERE TALKING, BUT HERE'S SO AGAIN, LOGAN KIMBALL, I'M HERE REPRESENTING THE HEIRLOOM DEVELOPMENT. GOOD TO SEE YOU GUYS. GLAD TO BE BACK. I CAN'T BELIEVE IT'S ALMOST BEEN A YEAR SINCE WE'VE BEEN HERE. BUT HERE WE ARE NONETHELESS. SO I WANT TO POINT OUT TO TAKE A LOOK AT THE HEIRLOOM SIGN ON THE BARN THERE THAT WE'VE GOT THE STRING LIGHTS AND STUFF. KEEP THAT IN THE BACK OF YOUR MIND AND YOU'LL SEE IT AGAIN IN JUST A MINUTE. BY WAY OF UPDATE REAL QUICK, PIT FINANCING WE SUBMITTED IN DECEMBER. SO WE WERE HERE WITH YOU GUYS IN AUGUST. LIKE NICK SAID, WE SUBMITTED PIT FINANCING AGREEMENT IN DECEMBER. KIND OF GOT, YOU KNOW, WORKING OUR WAY THROUGH IT. AND NOW HERE WE ARE KIND OF SOLVING THE LAST OF THE ISSUES. PHASE 120 261 DASH OR DASH ONE DASH CON IS OUR MASTER IMPROVEMENT SET OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS. WE SUBMITTED IT SHORTLY AFTER SUBMITTING THE PIT FINANCING AGREEMENT. WE'RE ALL CLEAR. WITH THE EXCEPTION OF TREES AND LANDSCAPE, LANDSCAPE PLANS ARE OUT TO BID, AND WE'RE GOING TO GET SOME FEEDBACK FROM THE POTENTIAL CONTRACTORS IN ORDER TO KIND OF FINALIZE THOSE DRAWINGS WITH THE CITY STAFF. AND THEN WE HAVE PHASE SIX A AND PHASE FOUR, WHICH ARE BOTH SINGLE FAMILY LOTS UNDER CONTRACT TO TWO BUILDERS IN EACH SECTION. EVERYBODY'S KIND OF EAGERLY AWAITING US GETTING STARTED, GETTING THOSE LOTS GOING. SO THAT'LL BE ROUGHLY 400 LOTS THAT WE'RE PUTTING ON THE GROUND OVER THE NEXT COUPLE OF YEARS. PECK PLANS ARE OUT FOR BID AS WELL. SO THIS, I THINK, GETS TO ONE POINT THAT YOU GUYS WERE KIND OF HONING IN ON. SO THE ROAD CONSTRUCTION THAT WE TALKED ABOUT, I THINK, IS DEFINITELY THAT COLLECTOR ROAD ALL THE WAY ACROSS. AND THE WAY I'VE DEPICTED IT ON HERE IS THAT THE STORM SEWER IS IN GREEN. THE TWO KIND OF BLOBS ARE THE PONDS THAT ARE IN QUESTION. THE WATER IS IN BLUE, AND THEN WASTEWATER IS IN RED. THE WASTEWATER THAT'S IN THE ROAD AS PART OF THE
[01:40:03]
CONSTRUCTION INSIDE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY, ACTUALLY DRAINS VIA THAT ONE LITTLE CONNECTION TO THE THE PIPE THROUGH THE CREEK. SO IT'S ALL GOT TO GET OVER TO NOLINA ULTIMATELY. SO ONE OF THE QUESTIONS CAME UP, COULD WE BUILD THE ROAD WITHOUT THE IMPROVEMENTS IN THE CREEK? AND I GUESS THE SHORT ANSWER IS YES, BUT WHEN YOU FLUSH A TOILET, IT WOULD GO INTO THE CREEK WITHOUT A PLACE TO GO. SO WE HAVE TO BUILD EFFECTIVELY. WE HAVE TO MAKE THE CONNECTION OVER TO NOLINA FOR ANY OF THE WASTEWATER SYSTEM TO FUNCTION PONDS. YOU KNOW, I THINK ONE OF THE QUESTIONS CAME UP, CAN WE CAN WE BUILD THESE THINGS? COULD WE PERMIT THE ROAD WITHOUT BUILDING SOME OF THIS INFRASTRUCTURE? AND THE SHORT ANSWER, I THINK, IS NO VIA CITY CODE OR BUILDING A RESIDENTIAL COLLECTOR. BUT ALSO THE T, C, Q SAYS YOU CANNOT BUILD A ROAD OR YOU CANNOT BUILD IMPERVIOUS COVER WITHOUT DETAINING IT. SLASH CLEANING THE RUNOFF. YOU KNOW, BEFORE IT RELEASES DOWNSTREAM. SO A COUPLE OF THINGS TO POINT OUT THERE. DO YOU GUYS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ON KIND OF HOW THE PROJECT FITS TOGETHER? AND THEN I'LL MOVE ON TO THE LANDSCAPE AND PARKLAND FUNCTION. HEY, LOGAN, WHENEVER YOU GET STARTED ON BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS, RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL IMPROVEMENTS, THAT IS WHERE DO YOU PLAN? WHERE'S PHASE ONE STARTING? SO THIS IS PHASE ONE. SO WHEN I NOTED THE THE CON ONE 2026 THIS ALL OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS ARE INCLUDED IN THAT SET OF DRAWINGS. AND THAT'S THE ONLY THING THAT'S IN THERE. SO WHEN PHASE TWO THEN WOULD BE THE NEXT THE SECOND PHASE, WHICH UNFORTUNATELY WE NEVER BUILD THEM IN SEQUENCE FOR WHATEVER REASON. THE SECOND PHASE IS SIX A, WHICH IS RIGHT HERE IN THIS KIND OF CORNER. IT'S ABOUT 100 LOTS THAT WILL GET BUILT. THAT'S PART OF SIX A, AND THEN PHASE FOUR IS ON THIS CORNER. THAT'S 150 LOTS. THAT THAT WILL START. ALL OF THIS HAS BEEN BID D.A. WON THE CONTRACT. THEY'RE THE SOLE CONTRACTOR FOR ALL OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS. AND THE PLAN ALL ALONG WAS TO KICK IT ALL OFF AT ONE TIME AND GET EVERYTHING GOING ALL AT ONCE. SO WE'D HAVE, YOU KNOW, WHAT WOULD THAT BE? 250, 250 LOTS, I GUESS, INITIALLY. AND THEN THIS WHOLE, YOU KNOW, TWO MILES OF ROAD PLUS THE INFRASTRUCTURE NECESSARY TO SERVE THE ROAD AND THE UTILITIES THAT GO WITH IT. WELL, I'M THE ROAD AND STUFF MAKES SENSE. OKAY. THE, THE CONNECTING OVER TO NOLINA. YEP. THERE WON'T BE ANY TOILETS TO FLUSH DURING PHASE ONE. YOU'RE JUST GOING TO HAVE ROAD AND UTILITIES AND THE ROAD TO CONNECT TO ONCE YOU GET GOING. SO I GUESS THE AGREEMENT WOULD ASSUME RIGHT NOW YOU WOULD BE PUTTING THAT LINE IN. ONCE YOU START THE PHASE WHERE THERE'S ACTUALLY TOILETS THAT ARE GOING TO BE CONNECTING IN. SO IN SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION, START AT THE LOW POINT WITH WASTEWATER IN PARTICULAR, START AT THE LOW POINT AND BUILD YOUR WAY UP. AND SO BECAUSE YOU SET THE DEPTHS AND YOU KNOW, YOU FIND VARIOUS THINGS THAT HAPPEN IN THE FIELD AS PART OF CONSTRUCTION. SO YOU WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU'RE NOT SETTING THE ELEVATION OF ONE WASTEWATER PIPE AND THEN HAVING, YOU KNOW, LIKE, FOR EXAMPLE, THIS IS NOT A SHORT RUN OF, OF WASTEWATER PIPE. SO IF IT CREEPS ITS WAY UP THE CREEK AND THEN GETS ON TOP OF THE ELEVATION OF THE PIPE THAT YOU'VE ALREADY PUT IN THE GROUND, NOW YOU GOT TO MOVE IT ALL. SO YOU GOT TO REMOVE AND REPLACE AND MOVE IT UP. SO ANYWAY, SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION SAYS START AT THE BOTTOM AND WORK YOUR WAY UP. SO BEING FLOODPLAIN, THAT'S THE BOTTOM. YEAH. THE NOLINA LIFT STATION IS THE LOW POINT. YEAH. BECAUSE THAT'S WHERE WE HAVE TO DRAIN TO. THAT'S OUR, THAT'S OUR, OUR ULTIMATE DISCHARGE OBVIOUSLY GETS PUMPED BACK UP THE HILL AND INTO THE CITY SYSTEM. BUT THAT'S OUR LOW POINT. AND SO WE'RE STARTING THERE ALL THE WAY UP. AND THEN THE, THE UTILITIES THAT GO IN THE ROAD, ACTUALLY UNDERNEATH THE ASPHALT ARE THE ELEVATION IS SOMEWHAT SET BASED ON WHERE THAT PIPE COMES THROUGH AND THE PARTICULAR TIE INS ALONG THE WAY. SO THAT'S WHY IT ALL KIND OF FITS TOGETHER A LITTLE BIT.IT'S NOT. YOU KNOW, AND I GUESS TO THAT END, IF YOU DON'T BUILD THE PIPE IN THE CREEK, THOSE TWO SECTIONS THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT BUILDING WITH LOTS IN IT CAN'T FLUSH THE TOILET BECAUSE ULTIMATELY IT HAS TO GO OVER TO NOLINA. SO. SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION IS, I GUESS THE ANSWER THAT I WOULD GIVE ON THAT. THANK YOU. YEP. SO THE SECOND PIECE OF OUR REQUEST AND KIND OF WHAT NICK WAS ALLUDING TO IS WE'VE GOT, YOU KNOW, LANDSCAPE THAT WE'RE PUTTING BACK ON TOP OF THE ROAD. SPECIFICALLY, THESE PLANS ARE WHAT'S IN THERE IN THE CITY.
IT'S A PART OF THAT. CON. ONE 2026 PLAN. IT'S OUT TO BID WITH THE LANDSCAPERS RIGHT NOW. SO
[01:45:05]
THAT'S INCLUDED IN THE MIA IMPROVEMENTS. AND THEN ADDITIONALLY HERE IS THE POND AND THE AND THE SORRY THE PARKLAND IMPROVEMENTS THAT WE'RE CONTEMPLATING IMPROVING, INCLUDING IN THIS ONE POND. ONE IS INCLUDED IN THE MIA BOND PONDS TWO, THREE AND FOUR. THEN GO WITH EACH OF THE INDIVIDUAL SECTIONS AS THEY COME ALONG IN THE SEQUENCE OF DEVELOPMENT. SO LOGAN, JUST SO I'M CLEAR THOUGH, ARE YOU ALL RIGHT NOW AS PART OF Y'ALL'S ASK THAT THOSE FUTURE PONDS WOULD ALSO BE CITY OWNED, HOA MANAGED, OR JUST THESE INITIAL ONES THAT ARE TIED TO THE ROAD SOLVE. SHORT ANSWER IS IF WE CAN SOLVE. WE. WE AGREED TO THE LANGUAGE THAT NICK SHOWED IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT EARLY ON, BECAUSE THAT WAS A PRETTY HARD AND FAST STANCE FROM THE CITY. WE SAID, OKAY, WE'LL GO SET ABOUT TRYING TO FIND AN ALTERNATIVE, TRYING TO FIND A WORKAROUND TO, YOU KNOW, ALLOWING THE HOA TO OWN IT AND THEN STILL INCLUDE IT AS AN ELIGIBLE EXPENSE AND REIMBURSEMENT. WE EFFECTIVELY HIT A COUPLE OF DEAD ENDS. WE CAN'T USE AN EASEMENT BECAUSE IT'S STILL NOT, YOU KNOW, THERE'S SOME LEGAL NUANCES TO THAT CAN'T USE A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT OR A PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT ON TOP OF IT. WE COULD DO A SEPARATE BOND AND DO A TAXABLE BOND BECAUSE WE CAN STILL ASSESS IT, BUT IT WOULD BE A TAXABLE BOND AS OPPOSED TO A TAX FREE MUNICIPAL BOND. AND IT WOULD BE SO SMALL THAT THERE WOULD BE NO MARKET FOR IT. SO THAT'S NOT REALLY A VIABLE, YOU KNOW, KIND OF WAY. SO ANYWAY, WE SET ABOUT TRYING TO FIND AN ALTERNATIVE, COULDN'T FIND AN ALTERNATIVE. AND THUS WE'RE BACK HERE JUST KIND OF MAKING ONE MORE KIND OF LAST EFFORT AND A REQUEST TO SEE IF THERE'S A WAY THAT WE COULD STRUCTURE THIS TO WHERE THE CITY CAN OWN THEM. BUT WE CAN PUT, YOU KNOW, A SIMILAR AGREEMENT TO HOW WE DO THE PARKS STRUCTURE, WHERE THE CITY OWNS THE PARKS. BUT THE HOA IS STILL ON THE HOOK TO INDEMNIFY AND, YOU KNOW, MAINTAIN ALL THE IMPROVEMENTS TO SOME STANDARDS AND. ET CETERA. ET CETERA. AND SO WE'RE TRYING TO BASICALLY WORK THE SAME SYSTEM FOR THE PONDS SO THAT WE CAN INCLUDE IT AS A RPID EXPENSE THAT GETS REIMBURSED. SO THAT'S, THAT'S HOW. SO YES, LONG ANSWER TO WE WOULD WE WOULD IF WE CAN FIGURE OUT HOW TO DO IT FOR POND ONE, WE'D LOVE TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO DO IT FOR PONDS TWO, THREE, FOUR, FIVE, SIX, SEVEN AS WELL. SO REMEMBER THE CORRUGATED METAL THAT WE HAD ON THE BARN? WE'RE GOING TO INCORPORATE THAT INTO ALL OF OUR ENTRY MONUMENTS. WE'RE WORKING WITH. THIS RETAIL STRIP IS ACTUALLY AT THE CORNER OF WILLIAMS AND HEIRLOOM PARKWAY ACROSS FROM H-E-B. AND WE'RE COORDINATING WITH HUNTINGTON, WHO OWNS THE CORNER TO BRAND IT HEIRLOOM, PUT OUR SIGNAGE ON THE CORNER AND INCORPORATE IT IN WITH THEIR, YOU KNOW, PLACARDS FOR THEIR ALL OF THEIR TENANTS AS WELL. AND I THINK THEY'RE ROUGHLY ON THE SAME KIND OF CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE AS WE ARE. SO. AND THIS I DON'T KNOW IF THIS HELPS, BUT HERE IS THE BOND. HERE IS THE BUDGET AS PRESENTED. SO AS PART OF THE AS PART OF THE PYD, WE CAN'T ASSESS THE GISD PROPERTY OBVIOUSLY, BECAUSE THEY DON'T PAY TAXES. SO WE HAVE TO CARVE OUT THE COST ASSOCIATED WITH GISD. AS A PORTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS COMING ACROSS. AND SO THAT'S HOW THIS ALL GETS BROKEN DOWN. BUT THAT'S WHERE THE 16.5 MILLION THAT NICK TALKED ABOUT COMES FROM. YOU KNOW, HERE'S THE THE HARD COST FOR JUST THE STREETS, THE SIGNALIZATION AT WILLIAMS, I MEAN, SORRY, AT HEIRLOOM PARKWAY AND RONALD REAGAN, EROSION CONTROLS, DRAINAGE PONDS OR DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS IN THE STREET. SO THIS MILLION SEVEN IS STORM SEWER. I THINK BACK TO, YOU KNOW, WHAT WE WERE TALKING ABOUT EARLIER WITH, WELL, THE PIPE UNDER THE ROAD IS TECHNICALLY GOING TO BE OWNED BY THE CITY, BUT IT THEN IT DRAINS INTO THE POND THAT IS TECHNICALLY OWNED BY THE HOA. AND HOW DOES THAT RELATIONSHIP WORK? SO ANYWAY, THE MILLION SEVEN IS THE PIPE THAT GOES UNDER THE ROAD. THE 994 AND THE 95 ARE THE TWO PONDS THAT WE'RE BUILDING AS A PART OF THAT WATER, WASTEWATER, PARKLAND IMPROVEMENTS, RIGHT OF WAY, LANDSCAPE ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING AND EVERYTHING ASSOCIATED WITH IT. HEY, LOGAN, IF YOU HAD TO BREAK UP THAT WASTE, THE 1.3 ON THE WASTEWATER BETWEEN THOSE, THE LINE THAT'S DIRECTLY KIND OF UNDER THE ROAD, LET'S CALL IT, OR IN THE RIGHT OF WAY VERSUS THE, THE ONE THAT'S DRAINING INTO NOLINA. DO YOU KNOW, WE CERTAINLY COULD. I DON'T HAVE THAT BREAKDOWN IN FRONT OF ME, BUT WE CERTAINLY COULD. SO. ALL RIGHT. LET'S ANY QUESTIONS FOR NICK OR LOGAN BEFORE WE GIVE OUR FEEDBACK? ALL RIGHT. NICK,[01:50:11]
YOU WANT TO PULL UP THE THE FEEDBACK YOU'RE LOOKING FOR AND I'LL START. YOU KNOW WHAT? I'M GONNA START ON MY LEFT THIS TIME. PERFECT. THANKS, TEAM, FOR THE PRESENTATION HERE. NO ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS. I DO SUPPORT THE VARIANCE TO ALLOW THE MODIFICATION OF THE THE VALUE TO LEAN RATIO. THAT DOESN'T BOTHER ME. THE LAST ONE THOUGH, THE OWNERSHIP OF THE PONDS. I'M JUXTAPOSING THE IDEA IN MY HEAD AND ITC, Q IS ONE OF THOSE ORGANIZATIONS THAT I'VE DEALT WITH MORE THAN I CHOSE TO IN THE TIME I'VE BEEN HERE, AND EXPOSING US TO MORE RISK IN DOING THAT IS NOT SOMETHING THAT I'M REALLY KEEN ON. NOW. AGAIN, IT'S NOT LOST ON ME. THE ECONOMIC VALUE OF THIS, YOU KNOW, THIS PIT AND WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN OUT THERE. SO AGAIN, I'M TRYING TO COMPARE THOSE TWO THINGS IN MY HEAD. THE RISK WE'RE GOING TO INCUR BY OWNING THE PONDS VERSUS, YOU KNOW, WHAT WE GET OUT OF DOING THIS. SO IF THE CITY WERE TO OPT NOT TO OWN THE PONDS, DOES THAT BREAK YOUR ABILITY TO MOVE THIS PROJECT OR. NO, I THINK LOOK, IF YOU DON'T MIND, COME UP JUST SO WE CAN GET IT ALL RECORDED. NO, I DON'T THINK THAT BREAKS THE ABILITY TO DO THE PROJECT, BUT I WOULD LIKE TO THINK THAT WE COULD GET TO. AND YOU KNOW, I TO KNOW THAT HAVING DONE DEVELOPMENTS LIKE THIS IN THE CITY OF AUSTIN, THEY HAVE A FORM THAT THEY IMPLEMENT ON EVERY SINGLE POND THAT THEY USE, WHERE THE CITY DOES OWN IT, BECAUSE ULTIMATELY, THE CITY OF AUSTIN WANTS TO MAKE SURE THAT THOSE PONDS GET MAINTAINED TO A HIGHER STANDARD AND KEEP TC OUT OF THEIR BACKYARD. SO THE CITY OF AUSTIN ACTUALLY TAKES OWNERSHIP AND HAS A MECHANISM FOR AN EASEMENT OVER TOP OF THE POND, AS WELL AS MINIMUM MAINTENANCE STANDARDS AND A MECHANISM TO PUT A LIEN ON THE PROPERTY THAT THEN GETS DISTRIBUTED THROUGH TO THE OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY, WHICH WOULD ULTIMATELY BE EACH OF THE RESIDENTS IF THEY DON'T MAINTAIN IT. SO THERE IS A THERE'S A MECHANISM THAT INDEMNIFIES THE CITY THROUGH THE HOA. IT JUST ALLOWS FOR THE UPFRONT CONSTRUCTION OF UPWARDS OF A MILLION ON THIS FIRST PHASE, AND WILL BE MULTIPLE MILLIONS OVER THE LIFE OF THE PROJECT. IT JUST ALLOWS A FUNDING MECHANISM FOR THOSE. SO YEAH. THANK YOU. AND THEN JUST SO I WANT TO MAKE SURE WE'RE GETTING CLEAR DIRECTION ON THIS. SO YOU'RE OKAY WITH THE 2 TO 1 RATIO AND WITH THEM USING THOSE FUNDS FOR EVERYTHING IN THEIR THEIR MASTER DEVELOPMENT AREA OR WHATEVER IT WAS CALLED, EXCEPT FOR THE PONDS. IF THEY CAN'T GET THE PONDS, THE OWNERSHIP ISSUE. IS THAT WHAT? JUST MAKE SURE I'M CORRECT. WELL, YES, I AGREE. GOT IT. GO AHEAD RON. I'M IN AGREEMENT. I DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. I'M IN AGREEMENT ON ITEM NUMBER TWO OF SUPPORTING AND EXPANDING. BUT I DON'T FEEL LIKE WE NEED TO OWN THE PONDS. YEAH. I'M AGAIN, I'M IN FAVOR OF EXPLORING MORE OPTIONS. AND I DON'T KNOW IF THIS IS POSSIBLE OR NOT. I KNOW THAT THE CITY IS BUYING THE FIRE STATION. I DON'T KNOW IF THERE'S SOME OFFSET THAT WE CAN DO WITH THAT AND COME TO SOME, SOME SORT OF AGREEMENT WITH WITH THE POND. I WOULD RATHER NOT GET INTO THE WATER QUALITY POND BUSINESS AS A CITY, BUT IF THERE'S SOME TRADE OFF THERE, I THINK THAT MAKES SENSE. A COUPLE QUESTIONS ALSO, NICK, FOR YOU, I THINK THE PROPERTY IS PROBABLY GOT AN EXEMPTION NOW. WHENEVER THE ROAD IS BUILT, THERE'S NOTHING, NO IMPROVEMENTS. THE THE INHERENT VALUE OF THE PROPERTY MAY IMPROVE BECAUSE OF THE ROAD ACCESS. BUT IF THAT EXEMPTION STAYS ON THE UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY, THAT WOULD BE DEVELOPED IN THE FUTURE, DOES A PIT ASSESSMENT IMPACTED BY AN EXEMPTION OR PIT ASSESSMENT? BEING NOT BEING TAXED IS NOT IMPACTED BY AN EXEMPTION. THEY COULD ANSWER THAT BETTER, BUT I THINK ONCE THEY START DEVELOPMENT THAT ONCE YOU ASSESS IT, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER OR NOT YOU'RE. BUT WHAT'S THE BUT THE VALUE? THE VALUE STILL HAS AN EXEMPTION ON THE APPRAISAL. HOLD ON A SECOND. WE'RE GOING TO PHONE A FRIEND. TALLY. YEAH. I'M TRYING TO FIGURE OUT HOW THE PIT BONDS WILL BE PAID WITHOUT ANY IMPROVEMENTS BEING MADE. IF IT'S ASSESSED ON JUST THE PROPERTY THAT IS UNDEVELOPED, THEN THAT MEANS THE OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY WILL HAVE TO PAY IT. BUT IF THERE'S AN EXEMPTION EXEMPTION THAT'S LOWERING VALUE OR LOWERING PUTTING CAPS ON, THEN IS THERE VALUE TO LEAN AS ONE THING? BUT WHAT'S DEBT SERVICE? WHAT'S CASH FLOW. SO THE PIT ASSESSMENT IS NOT AFFECTED IN ANY WAY, WHETHER IT'S TAXED AS AG OR IF YOU'RE IN REGULAR TAXES. SO THE PIT ASSESSMENT WILL BE THE SAME REGARDLESS. SO AG EXEMPTIONS DO NOT APPLY TO ASSESSMENTS. THEY ONLY APPLY TO PROPERTY TAXES[01:55:01]
THAT ARE ASSESSED CORRECT. BECAUSE A PIT ASSESSMENT IS AN ASSESSMENT NOT A TAX. THAT'S RIGHT. YEAH. MAKING SURE I'M FOLLOWING. SO THE CITY WOULD SEND A PIT BILL TO THE OWNER OF ALL THE REST OF THE PROPERTY. AND REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THEY'VE DEVELOPED IT OR NOT DEVELOPED IT, THEY'RE GOING TO PAY THAT PIT BILL WITH NO EXEMPTIONS, NO REGARD TO AG VALUE. IS THAT CORRECT? OKAY. JUST MAKING SURE WE'RE SAYING THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION. VALUE.AND I PROBABLY SHOULD STATE MY NAME FOR THE RECORD. SO THE SECRETARY DOESN'T GET MAD AT ME.
SO IT'S TALLY WILLIAMS. SO THE THE VALUE TO LEAN THAT NICK REFERENCED IS BASED ON THE APPRAISAL THAT WE JUST GOT AS PART OF THE PIT, AND IT IS ASSESSED ON AN AS ENTITLED BASIS. SO WITH NO IMPROVEMENTS. IS THAT THE YOU HAD A PRIVATE APPRAISER. THAT'S THE APPRAISAL DISTRICT. THAT IS THE PRIVATE APPRAISER FOR THE PIT. LIKE AS A PART OF ESTABLISHING THE PIT VALUE TO LEAN FOR THE UNDERWRITING DOCS. SO IT'S A THIRD PARTY APPRAISER. OKAY.
YEAH. I DON'T KNOW, NICK, IF THIS IS FOR YOU OR DAVID OR LEE IF SHE'S HERE, WHO. BUT PIT BONDS ARE ISSUED, ROADS BUILT. LOGAN DECIDES TO WALK THE PROJECT. I KNOW HE'S NOT GOING TO DO THAT, BUT YOU NEVER KNOW WHAT MAKE IT HAPPEN. AND NOW WE HAVE A VACANT LOT THAT IS IN JEOPARDY. WHO'S LIABLE FOR THOSE PIT BONDS NOW? ARE WE NOW LIABLE AS A CITY FOR THE PIT BONDS. AND HOW IS THAT? HOW IS THAT HANDLED? WHAT'S OUR RISK? LOOK, I'M TRYING TO ASSESS RISK OF THE CITY HERE. YEAH. SO YOU'RE TALKING THE WORST CASE SCENARIO. YES, ABSOLUTELY. I MEAN THE IN THE WORST CASE SCENARIO AND I MEAN TALLY MAY BE ABLE TO ANSWER THE TECHNICALITIES A LITTLE BIT BETTER THAN THAN I CAN. BUT I MEAN, IN THE WORST CASE SCENARIO, THE CITY HAS CLAIMED TO THE PROPERTY AT THAT POINT. SO I MEAN, IT ULTIMATELY, I DON'T KNOW IF I'M I DON'T KNOW. BUT YEAH, BUT WE ALSO AND SKY MAY WANT TO CHIME IN, BUT WHEN WE LOOKED AT OUR PIT POLICY AND DEVELOPED THAT INITIALLY AND LOOKED AT HOW THE ASSESSMENT RULES WORK AND THE PIT ASSESSMENT AND THE FACT THAT WE'RE ACTUALLY AUTHORIZING THE, YOU KNOW, THE PIT ASSESSMENT ON AN ANNUAL BASIS, WE WORK THROUGH THE LEGAL OBLIGATIONS AND, AND WHAT WE CONFIRM THROUGH THE LEGAL ANALYSIS AT THAT POINT WAS, NO, WE WE ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR, FOR ASSUMING THOSE ASSESSMENTS OR, OR LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAYMENT OR FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY OF SOME KIND OF FAILED PIT STRUCTURE. OKAY. SO WE'RE NOT I WAS THINKING THAT PIT, WE ACTUALLY ISSUED IT FOR THEM UNDER OUR BOND RATING. IS THAT NOT? I THOUGHT WE ISSUED UNDER OUR BOND RATING FOR PIT DEBT. IS THAT NOT CORRECT? I AM NOT ON COUNCIL. BUT YES, YOU THE CITY IS THE ONLY VEHICLE THAT CAN ISSUE THE BONDS. SO IT HAS TO BE MUNICIPALITY OR COUNTY THAT ISSUES THE BONDS, BUT IT DOES NOT. IF THE BONDS WERE TO GO DEFUNCT, WHICH THEY NEVER HAVE, IT WOULD NOT AFFECT THE CITY'S CREDIT RATING. SO WE CALL IT A HEADLINE RISK. LIKE THERE MIGHT BE A NEWSPAPER ARTICLE THAT SAYS CITY OF GEORGETOWN 2026 HEIRLOOM BONDS FAILED, BUT IT IS NOT GOING TO BE A HIT ON YOUR CREDIT RATING FOR THE CITY. OKAY, SO. I WOULD ALSO ADD TO THAT. AND ZACH IS HERE FROM DFG, WE'VE GOT THREE YEARS OF INTEREST RESERVE. AND SO THE AMOUNT OF THE BOND THAT WE'RE ACTUALLY ISSUING IS 24 MILLION AND CHANGE. AND THEN OUT OF THAT COMES INTEREST RESERVE AND A WHOLE BUNCH OF OTHER THINGS. SO WE'VE GOT THREE YEARS WORTH OF CAPITALIZED INTEREST IN THE BOND INTEREST. YEAH. OKAY. DOES ANY OF THAT ANALYSIS CHANGE IF WE TAKE OWNERSHIP OF THE BONDS.
OF THE PONDS? NO. OKAY. YEAH. THE OKAY. DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING QUEST? I THINK I'VE ASKED THOSE. I THINK IT MAKES A LOT OF SENSE TO, TO ADD THE ADDITIONAL COST FOR THE PIT CONSTRUCTION BONDS, FOR THE STUFF IN THE ROAD, THE. I UNDERSTAND LOGAN'S ANSWER ON START LOW ON THE ON THE OFF SIDE, WHAT WE CALL OFF SITE WASTEWATER OFF SITE FROM THE ROAD. IF THAT'S THE CASE, IF THAT'S NORMAL STANDARD, PROPER LINING UP. I'M NOT SAYING HE'S
[02:00:01]
WRONG, BUT IF THAT'S THE CASE, THEN I CAN SEE WHY IT WOULD MAKE SENSE TO GO AHEAD AND ALLOW THAT AS WELL. WOULDN'T MAKE SENSE TO HAVE LINE STOPPING AND THEN ELEVATION BE ALL OFF. YOU NEED TO START WHERE WHERE THE BOTTOM IS AND COME UP. THAT MAKES LOGICAL SENSE. BUT JAKE OR BEN MAY HAVE COMMENTS ON THAT, BUT. SO I'M FINE WITH ALL THAT. THE WATER QUALITY PONDS. UNDERSTAND THE ISSUE. I THINK ALLOWING NICK SOME OPPORTUNITY TO SEE IF THERE'S SOMETHING CAN BE WORKED ON THAT IS SOME KIND OF AGREEMENT THAT WOULD POSSIBLY MAKE SENSE. IF NOT, THEN WE I DON'T THINK WE SHOULD OWN THEM, BUT I THINK AT LEAST LETTING THEM LOOK INTO IT AND SEE IF THERE'S SOMETHING OUT THERE THAT WE CAN DO. WHATEVER CITY AUSTIN DOES, I DON'T KNOW, MAYBE THAT'S IT, I DON'T KNOW. BUT I THINK FOR FOR I'M AFRAID ABOUT SETTING PRECEDENT AND EXPECTATION. AND ALSO, YOU KNOW, WE'RE MAKING SOME CHANGES HERE.OBVIOUSLY, THE FIRST AGREEMENT WE PUT IN PLACE WE THOUGHT WAS THEY THOUGHT WE THOUGHT WOULD COVER EVERYTHING. YOU FIND SOME ISSUES HERE AND THERE. BUT I DO THINK THE. I WOULD APPRECIATE AND LIKE TO SEE THAT FIRE STATION SITE DEDICATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT. I THINK IT WOULD ALSO HELP IMPROVE THE THE DEVELOPMENT, THE VALUE OF DEVELOPMENT AND MARKETABILITY OF THE DEVELOPMENT. HAVING A FIRE STATION THERE, IT WOULD DEFINITELY HELP THE CITY. AND I THINK THE DEDICATION OF THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING I'D LIKE TO SEE AS WELL. NICK. THAT'S ALL I HAVE. THANK YOU. SO LESS THAN A YEAR AGO, WE HAD A AN AGREEMENT AND NOW THEN WE'RE RELOOKING THIS AGREEMENT. AND AS I RELOOKED THE AGREEMENT, I'M NOT SEEING WHAT IS IN IT FOR THE CITIZENS OF GEORGETOWN. I UNDERSTAND IT MAY MAKE IT A LITTLE BIT EASIER FOR THE DEVELOPER, BUT I'M NOT SEEING ANYTHING THAT WARRANTS US GOING BACK AND RENEGOTIATING SOMETHING THAT'S ALREADY BEEN NEGOTIATED. THE. IT SEEMS TO ME THAT THE COST OF THE ROAD DIDN'T COME IN AS HIGH AS WE THOUGHT. SO THEY WANT TO SEE IF THEY CAN USE SOME OF THAT MONEY FOR SOMETHING ELSE. AND THAT THAT JUST DOESN'T SIT WELL WITH ME. SO I DO NOT SUPPORT THE EXPANDING OF THE VARIANCE TO ALLOW THE ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION. AND AS FAR AS THE THE PONDS, I DON'T SEE IT BEING ADVANTAGEOUS TO THE CITIZENS OF GEORGETOWN FOR TAKING OVER THE OWNERSHIP OF THOSE PONDS. SO I'M NO AND NO. THANK YOU. DO YOU NOT THINK CONSIDERATION WOULD BE HAVING A FIRE STATION DEDICATED TO THE CITY THAT WE WOULDN'T HAVE TO BUY, WOULD NOT BE A BENEFIT TO THE CITIZENS AND PROPER CONSIDERATION FOR RENEGOTIATION OF THE CONTRACT.
THAT IS NOT WHAT WE'RE CONSIDERING TODAY. BUT IF THEY BROUGHT THAT IN, THAT WOULD BE THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING I'M PROPOSING THAT WE DO THAT. IF WE BROUGHT THAT IN, THAT WOULD BE DIFFERENT. OKAY. THANK YOU. YES. OKAY. SO KEVIN, I WAS ACTUALLY GOING TO ASK I, YOU KNOW, I DO THINK THERE'S BEEN A COUPLE THINGS. THE, THE FACT THAT WE ARE PURCHASING THE, THE LAND FOR THE FIRE STATION, I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THAT IN CONSIDERATION TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY ALSO THE RIGHT OF WAY ON WILLIAMS. I THINK THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE'RE ALSO, YOU KNOW, CONSIDERING WE'RE PURCHASING THAT VERSUS, YOU KNOW, THAT BEING SOMETHING THAT THE DEVELOPMENT IS DOING. SO I'M NOT THEN INTERESTED IN US ALSO TAKING OVER THE WATER QUALITY PONDS. I THINK, AGAIN, IF THERE'S SOMETHING THAT COULD BE BROUGHT BACK TO THE TABLE AND THOSE TWO OTHER THINGS I JUST MENTIONED, THEN, YOU KNOW, AND WE COULD COME UP WITH SOMETHING THAT WOULD WORK FOR FROM A LEGAL PERSPECTIVE. I'LL, I'LL BE HONEST, I WANT TO DO EVERYTHING EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE WAY OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN. SO IF THE CITY OF AUSTIN HAS A PLAN THAT WORKS WITH WATER QUALITY PONDS, I'D BE HAPPY TO HAVE OUR LEGAL LOOK AT THAT.
BUT THAT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT I'M GOING TO LOOK AT WHAT THE CITY OF AUSTIN IS DOING AS SOMETHING THAT WE WANT TO BE LIKE. SO IN THAT REALM, I DO NOT THINK THAT I'M INTERESTED IN THE WATER QUALITY PONDS. I THINK THE CONSTRUCTION BOND I'M INTERESTED IN COULD POTENTIALLY LOOK AT THAT. IF, AGAIN, IF WE'RE LOOKING BACK AT TWO OF THE OTHER THINGS THAT I JUST MENTIONED WITH THE DEDICATION OF THE FIRE STATION AND WILLIAMS DRIVE RIGHT AWAY, POTENTIALLY. THANKS. REAL QUICK, REAL QUICK, LOGAN, AGAIN, SINCE THIS HAS NOW COME UP TWICE THE GIVE AND THE THING THAT THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN IS GETTING IN THE CONSTITUENTS IN GEORGETOWN IS GETTING AS A PART OF THIS. IF YOU'LL REMEMBER BACK TO THAT FIRST PARAGRAPH THAT NICK PUT UP, WE'RE BUILDING THE ROAD ALL THE WAY ACROSS TWO MILES OF OF FOUR LANE COLLECTOR ROAD ALL THE WAY ACROSS TO MAKE THAT COMMERCIAL LOOP CONNECTION. SO THAT WAS OUR GIVE. AND FOR THAT, YOU AGREED TO LET US DO CONSTRUCTION BONDS. SO THAT'S SO REALLY WHAT WHAT WE THINK WE'VE ALREADY ALSO NEGOTIATED THE AGREEMENT. AND SO WE'RE JUST HERE KIND OF MAKING SURE THAT WE GET CLARIFICATION FROM YOU GUYS. SO THAT WAS OUR THAT
[02:05:02]
WAS THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT, I GUESS. YEAH. AND I THINK FROM WHAT I JUST SAID, I THINK I CAN, I CAN STILL, YOU KNOW, BE OKAY WITH, YOU KNOW, WHAT WE, WHAT OUR AGREEMENT SAYS WITH WILLIAMS RIGHT AWAY AND WITH THE DEDICATION OF THE FIRE STATION AND UNDERSTAND WHAT Y'ALL ARE WANTING TO DO, YOU KNOW, WITH THE CONSTRUCTION BOND. BUT I DON'T THINK ADDING WATER QUALITY PONDS IN IS SOMETHING THAT I'M WILLING TO GIVE THERE ON. YEAH. I MEAN. I THINK THAT I'M FINE WITH. EXPANDING THE VARIANCE TO ALLOW FOR ALL OR SOME OF THE COST RELATED TO THE, THE CONSTRUCTION, BUT I'M FINE WITH THAT. I DON'T REALLY WANT US TO OWN THE OWN THE WATER, WATER QUALITY PONDS. I SHARE COUNCIL MEMBER STEWART'S OPINION THAT IT SEEMS LIKE THAT SEEMS LIKE MORE OF A LIABILITY AND SOMETHING THAT WE'RE GOING TO.EVEN IF WE EVEN IF WE SET AN AGREEMENT IN PLACE, IT'S SOMETHING ELSE TO MANAGE. WHEN IT GOES SIDEWAYS DOWN THE ROAD, IT SEEMS LIKE MORE OF A COMPLICATION THAN IT'S WORTH.
BUT I THINK, YOU KNOW, FOR. YEAH, I AGREE WITH WHAT EVERYBODY ELSE HAS SAID AS IT PERTAINS TO THE FIRE STATION SITE. AND, YOU KNOW, I'M FINE, YOU KNOW, NEGOTIATING PORTIONS OF THAT. CONSTRUCTION TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE ISSUANCE OF THE BOND AS WELL. THANK YOU. I JUST WANT TO SAY ONE THING, LOGAN, I AGREE. I COULD SEE WHY YOU WOULD FEEL THE WAY YOU DO ON THE ROAD. I MEAN, I THINK THE PARK IMPROVEMENT IS A DIFFERENT ASK THAT WASN'T ASKED ORIGINALLY AND NOT ENVISIONED IN THE IN THE CONTRACT OR THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT. I JUST WANTED TO MAKE A STATEMENT THERE. THANK YOU. SO I THINK I'M GOING TO TRY TO SUMMARIZE HERE. I THINK WE'VE GOT CONSENSUS THAT THEY CAN GO TO THE 2 TO 1 ON ALL THE IMPROVEMENTS THAT THEY'VE LAID OUT, OTHER THAN THE WATER QUALITY PONDS. I MEAN, AND I GUESS MY $0.02 ON THAT IS, YOU KNOW, THERE'S PROBABLY A A WAY TO GET THAT DONE. WHAT I WOULD TELL LOGAN AND THE TEAM IS YOU'RE PROBABLY NOT GOING TO WANT TO WAIT AROUND ON US TO FIGURE THAT OUT FOR THIS PROJECT. YOU KNOW, THAT THAT MAY BE SOMETHING TO LOOK AT ON FUTURE PROJECTS. IF WE IF WE KNOW FROM THE GET GO THAT THAT'S GOING TO BE A REQUIREMENT. I MEAN, YOU KNOW, WE DO IT WITH THE PARKS. I'M NOT PHILOSOPHICALLY OPPOSED TO DOING IT, BUT I JUST DON'T THINK IT'S GOING TO WORK FAST ENOUGH FOR THIS PROJECT. SO I THINK JULIAN JUST OFFERED FOR PALMER RANCH TO OWN THE DETENTION PONDS. I THINK JOE PERSONALLY SAID HE WOULD JUST TAKE HIM OVER AND MAINTAIN HIM. NICK, MAKE SURE YOU WRITE THAT DOWN IN YOUR NOTES. ALL RIGHT? YOU GOOD. NICK. YES. THANK YOU. THANK YOU ALL VERY MUCH. JOE
[1.D Pole Attachment Policy Updates]
HAS SAID YES TO. SO THAT'S CONTRACT LEGALLY BINDING LEGALLY BINDING. AND NOW WE'RE GOING TO BRING UP DANIEL. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. DANIEL WITH ELECTRIC. I BRING FORWARD TO YOU A VERY ENGAGING AND RIVETING CONVERSATION ABOUT POLE ATTACHMENTS. YEAH. THE CITY OF BOSTON, ONCE BITTEN, TWICE SHY. ANYHOW, THE POLE ATTACHMENT POLICY, BASICALLY, ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE'VE ALWAYS DONE FOR THE PAST FEW YEARS IS, IS IDENTIFY COST CAUSATION AND MAKE SURE THE COSTS ARE PAID BY THE ENTITIES THAT ARE CAUSING THE COSTS AS PART OF THAT PRINCIPLE, THAT HAS ACTUALLY HELPED US TO KEEP THE COSTS LOW FOR OUR RATEPAYERS. AND ONE SUCH PROGRAM IS THE POLE ATTACHMENT POLICY. I HAVE WITH ME, RICHARD, WHO MANAGES ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS, AND ALEX FINN, WHO WORKED ON THIS. WE'LL BE QUICK.WE'LL GO OVER THE POLICY UPDATES. SO ALEX, TAKE OVER. AND IF WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I'LL JUMP IN. IF I CANNOT ANSWER. WAYNE HAS AGREED TO ANSWER AS WELL. SO. GOOD AFTERNOON, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. THANKS FOR YOUR TIME. I'LL TRY TO BE AS EFFICIENT WITH IT AS POSSIBLE. AGAIN, I'M ALEX SPIN, I'M THE ENGINEERING DESIGN SUPERVISOR FOR THE ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT. JUST SOME BACKGROUND ON OUR POLE ATTACHMENT POLICY. THIS POLICY AFFECTS THINGS OTHER THAN POWER CARRYING INFRASTRUCTURE ON OUR POLES. SO THIS IS THINGS LIKE YOUR COM, AT&T FRONTIER, ALL YOUR COMMUNICATION COMPANIES THAT HAVE TO GET ON OUR ON OUR POLES. WHEN THEY ATTACH TO OUR POLES, THEY PUT LOAD ON IT. IT USES OUR INFRASTRUCTURE AND WE NEED TO HAVE A WAY TO RECOVER ALL THOSE COSTS. WE. GOING INTO THE HISTORY OF IT, WE USED TO HAVE A SORT OF INFORMAL PROCESS FOR POLE ATTACHMENTS. WE IN 2021, WE ADOPTED A MORE FORMAL
[02:10:03]
PROCESS. WE GOT A PLATFORM CALLED A AND B, WE STARTED TAKING APPLICATIONS AND ACCEPTING PLAS FROM DEVELOPERS. THAT ALLOWED US TO REFINE OUR FEES. AND THEN IN 2023 UNTIL 2025, WE TOOK ON AN EXTERNAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT TO MANAGE ALL THESE APPLICATIONS FOR THESE COMMUNICATION COMPANIES THAT WANTED TO GET ONTO OUR POLES. STARTING IN 2025, WE DECIDED, HEY, WE CAN DO ALL THIS IN-HOUSE, SO LET'S DO IT. AND THIS YEAR IS THE FIRST YEAR WHERE WE'RE IMPLEMENTING A UNIVERSAL POLE ATTACHMENT POLICY AGREEMENT THAT ALL OF OUR ATTACH ATTACHING ENTITIES WILL BE SUBJECT TO. SO IT'S A IT'S SORT OF A BIG STEP FOR US AND REALLY TRYING TO BE MORE SOPHISTICATED IN OUR POLICIES. THE STANDARDS AND FEE MODEL WE'RE PROPOSING TO BE ADJUSTED ANNUALLY AS WELL. THE COST THAT REVIEWS THAT GO INTO THIS POLICY ARE THINGS LIKE LABOR RATES, YOUR FLEET COSTS, CONTRACTED LABOR FOR POLE INSPECTIONS, AND ALL THE SOFTWARE COSTS, WHICH CAN BE KIND OF SNEAKY LITTLE ADDITIONS IN THERE. THIS YEAR, THE REVISED FEE SCHEDULE IS KIND OF THE MAIN CHANGE. NUMBER TWO, ONE TOUCH MAKE READY. THAT'S SORT OF THAT'S EXCITING FOR ALL OF US THAT ARE KIND OF IN THIS WORLD. I'LL GO INTO THAT LATER. WE HAVE A NEW TAGGING PLAN. WE'RE GOING TO CLEARLY DEFINE TIMELINES AND EXPECTATIONS. THAT MAY BE A LITTLE BIT MUDDY AT THIS POINT, AND SOME NEW COLLECTIVE ACTIONS BETWEEN US AND THE ATTACHES ATTACHED. SORRY. HERE'S A TABLE SHOWING AN UPDATE OF OUR FEES THAT WE'RE APPLYING. THE APPLICATION FEE IS CHANGING. IT'S GOING UP ABOUT 7%. THE APPLICATION FEE COSTS COVER THINGS LIKE INITIAL REVIEW OF THAT APPLICATION, MAKING SURE THEY SUBMIT ALL THE DOCUMENTS, REVIEWING THE ENGINEERING FORMS THAT THEY HAVE TO SUBMIT AN ACTUAL FIELD VISIT, AND THEN TWO INSPECTIONS FOR THEM ATTACHING TO OUR POLE.THAT'S ALL INCLUDED IN THAT INITIAL COST. WE ARE INCREASING THE REINSPECTION FEE SOMEWHAT LARGER AMOUNT 56%. THE REASONING BEHIND THIS IS WE'RE MORE EDUCATED AS TO OUR FLEET COSTS WERE ABLE TO. REALLY MORE ACCURATELY PUT THOSE INTO OUR INSPECTIONS. NOW THAT WE ARE THE ENTITY DOING THOSE INSPECTIONS. AND WE'RE ALSO TRYING TO DISINCENTIVIZE RE-INSPECTIONS, WE GET TWO INSPECTIONS WITH THAT INITIAL INSPECTION. WE WANT THEM TO GET IT RIGHT WITH THOSE FIRST TWO, THE MAKER ENGINEERING DESIGN FEE THAT IS STAYING THE SAME.
THAT'S ACTUALLY THE COST FOR CREATING A DESIGN. IF THEY WANT TO ATTACH TO OUR POLE, THE POLES AREN'T STRONG ENOUGH TO HOLD YOUR YOUR COMMUNICATION WIRES THAT YOU WANT TO HANG UP.
YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO PAY TO INCREASE THE SIZE OF THOSE POLE POLES. AND SO THEY'RE ADEQUATE.
THE MAKER DECONSTRUCTION FEE THAT'S ALWAYS AT COST. OUR MATERIALS ARE UPDATED DAILY.
OUR LABOR RATES ARE UPDATED ANNUALLY. SO THOSE ARE ALL UP TO DATE AND AT COST SPECIFIC TO THE UPGRADES THAT ARE BEING MADE. OUR ANNUAL RENTAL FEE IS STAYING THE SAME. THE ANNUAL RENTAL FEE IS BASED ON THE POLE SPACE THAT EACH ATTACHMENT USES UP, AND THAT'S A PER ATTACHMENT FEE. WE ARE ADDING SOME VIOLATION FEES. THESE. THE INTENTION BEHIND THESE IS REALLY TO DEVELOP A MORE EFFECTIVE RELATIONSHIP WITH A LOT OF THESE ATTACHES. WE HAVE TROUBLE GETTING A HOLD OF OUR ATTACHMENTS. AND IF THEY'VE GOT A COMM LINE THAT'S KIND OF HANGING DOWN AND IT'S, IT'S IN VIOLATION OF THE ESC. IT'S, IT'S, IT'S HONESTLY A PAIN TO GET THEM TO COME OUT AND FIX THESE. AND SO BEING ABLE TO LEVY FEES ON THESE ATTACHES WILL ALLOW US, GIVE US THE TEETH WE NEED TO BE ABLE TO REACH OUT AND SAY, YOU'VE BEEN IN VIOLATION FOR THREE DAYS. THERE'S A GRACE PERIOD WITH EACH OF THESE. SO IT'S SPECIFIC TO THE FEE, BUT THEY'LL HAVE SOME PERIOD OF TIME FROM THEIR INITIAL WARNING TO CORRECT THOSE. AND THEN WE'LL START LEVYING FEES PER ATTACHMENT. IS THAT LIKE SO WHEN I DRIVE THROUGH SONATA, I'LL SEE LINES COMING DOWN LIKE THIS BLACK BOX JUST HANGING AT THE AT THE GROUND IN PEOPLE'S YARDS, BASICALLY. AND I'VE BEEN THINKING THAT THE, THE IT COMPANY, THE TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, IT'S THEIR, THEIR DATA, THEIR DATA LINES, THEY HAVEN'T BEEN THERE ALWAYS. IT WAS AFTER THEY WERE EXTENDING WI-FI FIBER FIRST OR SOMEBODY'S. I'M GUESSING I KEEP THINKING THAT THEY'RE JUST NOT DONE AND THEY'RE GOING TO COME BACK, BUT THEY JUST KEEP LAYING THERE ON THE GROUND NEXT TO THE POLE. IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT THAT WE DON'T HAVE THE TEETH TO FIX? THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT. GREAT, GREAT.
YEAH. CAN I ASK A QUESTION ABOUT THAT TOO? I KNOW YOU JUST SAID THAT YOU HAVEN'T DETERMINED THE AMOUNT OF TIME THAT YOU WOULD GIVE THEM, BUT WHAT'S A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF
[02:15:03]
TIME WE WOULD GET PEOPLE TO GET THIS FIXED BEFORE THEY START BEING ASSESSED FEES. WE DO HAVE A TIME LIMIT PER FEE ESTABLISHED. I DON'T KNOW IT OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD, BUT FOR AN UNAUTHORIZED ATTACHMENT IT WOULD BE, SAY, I THINK IT'S FIVE BUSINESS DAYS FROM THE THE DAY WE GIVE YOU A NOTICE, YOU HAVE THAT MANY DAYS. AND THEN FROM THAT POINT WE START LEVYING A FEE PER ATTACHMENT. OKAY. SO IT IS IT'S A PRETTY TIMELY. IT SOUNDS LIKE, YOU KNOW, YEAH, I'M SAYING I WOULD BE PRO A TIMELY. I MEAN, I DON'T WANT PEOPLE, YOU KNOW, HAVING MONTHS TO RECTIFY THEIR, YOU KNOW, THEIR ISSUE. THEY NEED TO GET OUT AND GET THIS FIXED IN A TIMELY FASHION, WHICH I WOULD ASSUME IS A COUPLE WEEKS, I MEAN, AT A MAX TO MAYBE 30 DAYS OR SOMETHING, BUT THESE WOULDN'T LAG OUT TO WHERE THEY HAVE MONTHS TO FIX THIS. EXACTLY. WE KNOW THAT IF, IF ONE OF THEIR COMM LINES GO DOWN, THEY'RE OUT THERE WITHIN 24 HOURS. SO WE KNOW THEY HAVE THE ABILITY TO THEY JUST DON'T HAVE THE INCENTIVE RIGHT NOW.AND SO THAT'S WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO IMPLEMENT. OKAY, GREAT. AND THESE NOTES DOWN HERE, I JUST WANTED TO POINT OUT THIS HISTORICALLY COORDINATING, ADDRESSING SAFETY VIOLATIONS WITH THESE ATTACHED ENTITIES IS NOTORIOUSLY DIFFICULT. WE HAVE IN ADDITION TO THESE FEES, WE'VE STARTED USING SOME PUBLIC NOTIFICATION SERVICES LIKE ENGINES, NATIONAL JOINT USE SOMETHING, SOMETHING THAT IT'S SORT OF A, A PORTAL THAT EVERYBODY WHO IS ATTACHED TO OUR POLLS CAN GO IN THERE AND SEE IF THERE'S ANY UPDATES AND STUFF. IT'S JUST ANOTHER AVENUE OF COMMUNICATION TO HELP US FIX THESE ISSUES. SO THAT WAS PRETTY QUICK. IN SUMMARY, WE DO RECOMMEND ACCEPTING THESE CHANGES. IT'S GOING TO HELP US PAY FOR THE POLES THAT WE'RE HAVING TO PUT IN TO SUPPORT THESE LINES. I DON'T THINK I HAVE TO TELL ANY OF YOU GUYS THAT, YOU KNOW, THE INTERNET'S GROWING. WE HAVE TO BE ABLE TO SUPPORT THE ACCESS TO THAT.
PART OF THAT IS MORE COMM LINES ON OUR POLES, MORE WEIGHT ON OUR POLES. WE'VE GOT TO ADJUST.
WE DID REVIEW THE WITH THE ELECTRIC BOARD ON JUNE 18TH, THE EFFECTIVE DATE IS STILL TBD.
IT'S IN. WE'RE STILL REVIEWING IT INTERNALLY. WE'RE AT THE WORKSHOP NOW. WE'RE IN PROCESS AND WE WILL IMPLEMENT IT AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. AND THEN. SO EFFECTIVE JULY 1ST, 26 WOULD NOT BE RETROACTIVE. SO THOSE. WE COULDN'T USE THIS POLICY ON THOSE LINES. JUST LAYING THERE, LIKE I SAID, YOU KNOW, AND I'M GUESSING THERE ARE SOME AREAS I'M PICKING ON SARASOTA JUST BECAUSE I DRIVE THROUGH IT QUITE A BIT. AND I'M SURE THERE'S SOME OTHER AREAS WHERE THERE'S SOME LINES THAT ARE VERY LOW. I DON'T KNOW HOW SOME SOME BIGGER TRUCKS GET THROUGH THERE. IS THIS ENVISION REQUIRING THOSE. THEY'RE NOT ELECTRICAL, THEIR DATA AS WELL.
WOULD IT ENVISION MAKING SURE THE STANDARDS WISE IT'S THEY'RE THEY'RE PUT IN HIGH ENOUGH OVER OVER STREETS. YES. YES, ABSOLUTELY. THERE'S DIFFERENT REQUIREMENTS. IF YOU'RE OVER A STREET, THE TYPE OF ROAD YOU'RE GOING OVER, THERE'S HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS. AND THAT'S, THAT'S PER THE NSC. SO WE HAVE WE HAVE NO PROBLEM ENFORCING. PERFECT. THANK YOU. MR. PITTS.
WHAT WE ARE ALSO DOING IS WE ARE ACTUALLY DOING WHAT'S CALLED A JOINT USE AUDIT, WHERE WE WILL BE USING A THIRD PARTY TO GO AND AUDIT ALL OF THE ATTACHES TO OUR POLES. WE WILL IDENTIFY WHO ARE THE ATTACHING COMPANIES, WHO ARE THE OWNERS, AND THAT WILL ACTUALLY GIVE US A LOT MORE ABILITY TO ENFORCE THESE REQUIREMENTS THAT WE ARE PUTTING IN PLACE. AND LET'S SAY THAT THOSE ONES I'M TALKING ABOUT ARE LAYING THERE. WHOEVER ATTACHED THOSE, IF THEY COME AND REQUEST ANOTHER AGREEMENT FOR SOMEWHERE ELSE IN THE CITY, CAN WE I DON'T KNOW IF WE LEGALLY CAN DO THIS. IT'S COMPLETELY SEPARATE, BUT CAN WE REQUIRE LIKE THEM TO GO FIX AND CORRECT THOSE FOR THEM TO GET THEIR NEXT AGREEMENT PUT IN PLACE? YES, YES, WE WE ARE REQUIRED TO ALLOW COMPANIES TO ATTACH, BUT WE ARE NOT. WE DON'T HAVE TO CREATE LIABILITY TO OURSELVES OR TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC. SO ANY OF THESE VIOLATIONS, WE WILL HAVE THE ABILITY TO MAKE SURE THAT THESE VIOLATIONS ARE ADDRESSED BEFORE WE PROCESS THE NEW APPLICATION.
OKAY, GREAT. THANK YOU. WELL, THERE IS LANGUAGE IN THE POLICY TOO. IF THEY DON'T PAY THEIR FEES OR THEY HAVEN'T, THEY ARE HAVE VIOLATIONS. WE WILL STOP THEIR ONGOING APPLICATIONS AND NOT ALLOW THEM TO HAVE ANY MORE ATTACHMENTS WITHIN THE CITY. AND THEN ONE MORE JUST KIND OF PUBLIC PIECE ON THIS. WE GET A LOT OF CALLS ABOUT THE STUB POLES. WHEN YOU SEE A NEW POLE GOING IN AND YOU SEE A SMALLER POLE NEXT TO IT THAT STILL HAS THOSE COLUMN LINES ON IT, I GET CALLS ABOUT THEM ALL THE TIME IMPLEMENTING THIS POLICY. WE HAVE A ONE TOUCH PROGRAM TO WHERE WHEN ONE COM COMPANY MOVES OVER, THEY CAN MOVE THE REST OF THEM. THE PROBLEM IS NOW WHEN ONE COMPANY MOVES IN, THERE'S FOUR ATTACHMENTS ON A POLE THAT'S FOUR DIFFERENT COMPANIES. INSTEAD OF COORDINATING WITH ALL OF THOSE, HAVING A ONE TOUCH WOULD ALLOW
[02:20:02]
THAT FIRST COMPANY TO MOVE ALL THE LOCATIONS, AND THEN WE'RE OFF OF THE STUB POLE AND WE CAN GO IN AND REMOVE IT AND GET THAT EYESORE OUT OF THE PUBLIC. THAT'S SOMETHING THAT I'M PRETTY EXCITED ABOUT. ALL RIGHT. OTHER QUESTIONS? ANY COMMENTS? GOOD TO GO. RIVETING, DANIEL.[Executive Session]
THANK YOU. THANK YOU ALL VERY MUCH. WE'RE GOING TO ROLL INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AND COVER SECTIONS